On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Mark Taylor wrote:
> So I'm suggesting that you either do what you say with changing the
> semantics of maxval but also drop the actval argument, or retain
> actval and forget the NULL termination. My preferred preference
> would be for the latter (since you might want actval up front to
> do some additional allocation say).
NULL termination forgotten.
--
Tim Jenness
JAC software
http://www.jach.hawaii.edu/~timj
|