Tim,
TJ > That's exactly what I proposed.
Good. Apologies I hadn't read your original message (Answer 2) zipping
through a bulging inbox. On Answer 1: don't be so sure. Most .SDF
components get created by mistake.
Don't forget to update all the documentation accordingly after you've
implemented allowing .sdf. (-: If it's a success then for your next
trick how about naming NDF file types .ndf, parameter files .par, agi
files .agi etc. Then we'll need tasks to report the comments in a
pleasing layout for the parameter and AGI files (PARTRACE and
AGITRACE?).
Enough facetiousness, when you're done, we'll have to revise the current
important documents to reflect the newbie-friendly naming of HDS
files. As to whether we advertise it widely or not is a mute point.
It's something that ought to have been done when you were still at
school. Wasn't it discussed at one of the ADAM Workshops?
Malcolm
|