Or, rather than redesign the way they work in order to fit in with
software, they could use a document imaging / management / publishing
system that provides them with the facilities they need!!
Best Regards
------------------------------------------
Document Management
Geoff Baldwin
SingleRapid - Document Solutions
Delivering Efficiency to Business
www.dotdocs.co.uk
Tel: +44 (0)8700 791 791
dir: +44 (0)1784 221 017
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: The UK Records Management mailing list
>>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
>>Alistair Tough
>>Sent: 07 December 2005 09:52
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>Subject: Re: Online Planning Applications - possible issue
>>with identity t heft
>>
>>Or they could simply re-design their forms so that the
>>signature(s) are on a sheet that has no other information
>>content and therefore can be set aside when 'publishing' the
>>documents.
>>
>>Regards
>>
>>Alistair
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: The UK Records Management mailing list
>>[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Roy Russell
>>Sent: 07 December 2005 09:39
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>Subject: Re: Online Planning Applications - possible issue
>>with identity theft
>>
>>
>>Hi Dik,
>>
>>They are probably scared that they will need to spend a lot
>>of time, effort, and money properly 'redact enabling' all of
>>their applications.
>>
>>If this is the case then I would recommend that they take a
>>look at a superb new utility called 'Rapid Redact'
>>(http://www.rapidredact.com). They would then see how easy
>>and cost effective it is to comply with your advice, whatever
>>the document types they are publishing!
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Roy Russell
>>Ascertus Limited
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: The UK Records Management mailing list
>>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dik Allison
>>Sent: 07 December 2005 00:24
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>Subject: Online Planning Applications - possible issue with
>>identity theft
>>
>>Our council (Newark and Sherwood), like many others, now
>>publishes images of all planning applications on the
>>Internet. These show the full name and address details, along
>>with a scanned image of the applicant's signature.
>>
>>We have asked Newark & Sherwood to redact the signatures
>>(i.e. blank them
>>out) in order to reduce the opportunity for identity theft.
>>Their initial reaction has been fairly dismissive.
>>
>>There will clearly be other forms with similar information on display.
>>
>>Please can I have some feedback from the good folks of RMS on
>>your views about this.
>>
>>Dik Allison
>>Senior Partner, Allison Consultancy (www.allicon.com).
>>
>>PS - if you want to see our form for reference go to:
>>
>>http://www.nsdc.info/eplanning/default.aspx?
>>sid=1&sindex=1&id=4&refno=05/00973/FUL
>>
>>(if the URL is split onto 2 lines you will need to rejoin it manually)
>>
|