The outcome of the EGEE meeting wasn't that clear to me. A few people
were actioned to go away and sort things out but the boundaries within
which they were to work weren't obvious to me. I heard quite a bit of
dissent on the use of XML.
What were the actions? Did anyone commit to integrating all the
non-glite components into this framework? This is presumably an ongoing
task as other tools develop in parallel.
Would Jeremy or Owen like to comment?
John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Burke, S (Stephen)
> Sent: 04 November 2005 16:21
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: installation tools situation
>
> Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes
> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Peter Gronbech said:
> > We are all very happy with Yaim and are not looking forward to any
> > further complications, that XML/python would bring.
>
> The point is that people are quite likely to *get* the
> python/xml method unless there is quite a lot of resistance.
> If people want some idea of what's involved you can look at
> the glite installation instructions
> here:
>
> http://glite.web.cern.ch/glite/packages/R1.4/R20050916/doc/ins
> tallation_
> guide.html
>
> and you can see some (old) examples of the config files if
> you click on the node names here:
>
> http://egee-jra1-testing.web.cern.ch/egee-jra1-testing/testbed
> /extended-
> list.html
>
> Stephen
>
|