My view on the use of CLEA UK for regulatory purposes is that it is
likely to be so much better than what we have at present, so should be
used. The current position is a hotch-potch of different models, with a
strong reliance on SNIFFER. If a program has got to the beta stage, it
has been tested by quite a few people and the main bugs should be ironed
out. I equate this as a "probationary period" before the final release
and not as a "first draft".
Regards,
Kevin Privett.
Dr Kevin Privett
Principal Geo-Environmental Consultant
Hydrock Consultants Ltd
Over Court Barns
Over Lane
Almondsbury
Bristol
BS32 4DF
Tel: (01454) 619533
Fax: (01454) 614125
[log in to unmask]
Cell phone: (07799) 430870
Offices in Bristol, Plymouth, Northampton, Stoke-on-Trent.
www.hydrock.com
Disclaimer
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be read, copied
or used only by the intended recipients. If you are not the intended
recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution,
copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
e-mail in error please advise us immediately by return e-mail at
[log in to unmask] and delete the e-mail document without making a
copy. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure this email is virus
free, no responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from
viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent.
-----Original Message-----
From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Fairwood, Duncan (UK)
Sent: 04 November 2005 13:19
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: SNIFFER values
Neil and everyone else,
Does this answer indicate that the CLO community is prepared to accept
assessments using the beta tested CLEA UK before the final version is
released, reportedly in 6 months time?
Interested to hear views on this.
Duncan
Duncan Fairwood
Senior Geo-Environmental Consultant
BAE Systems Environmental
Brisance House
Euxton Lane
Chorley
PR7 6AQ
01257 242264 / 242000
-----Original Message-----
From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Neil
Parry
Sent: 04 November 2005 12:56
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: SNIFFER values
*** WARNING ***
This mail has originated outside your organization, either from an
external partner or the Global Internet.
Keep this in mind if you answer this message.
As the new CLEA model is out today you could ask them to re-run these
using BETA CLEA.
-----Original Message-----
From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Jessica Lenham
Sent: 04 November 2005 12:30
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: SNIFFER values
Hi all,
a quick question about values obtained by SNIFFER. I have to sign this
report off by the end of the day, it was supposed to all be stright
forward!
I am simply checking through a validation report for a site we are
pretty
happy with. However, they derived guideline values for copper and zinc
from SNIFFER - and the values are 129387 mg/kg for copper, and 649566
mg/kg for Zinc!! Surely something went wrong in their calculations
there?
Or would the fact that the site is residential without plant uptake just
create really high values becuase there is less of an exposure?
Any help gratefully received....
Jessica Lenham
Waverley Borough Council
Scanned by MailDefender - managed email security from intY -
www.maildefender.net
Geotechnical Engineering Ltd, Rock House, Lower Tuffley Lane,
Gloucester. GL2 5DT Registered office, No. 700739, England
Telephone: 01452 527743
Facsimile: 01452 507435
www.geoeng.co.uk
This message is intended only for the named recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying,
distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this
information is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error please notify Geotechnical
Engineering Ltd immediately. The recipient should check this email and
any attachments for the presence of viruses. Geotechnical Engineering
Ltd accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted
by this email.
intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com)
********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************
|