On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, David Berry wrote:
> Time,
> We already have a divergence in naming of starlink header files, in
> that some are "pkg.h" and some are "pkg_par.h". If we adopted "pkg_par.h"
> as the new standard for header files, at would at least avoid having to
> change things to have a star/include/star directory.
>
I actually like $STARLINK/include/star since that is another safety net
for those of us considering a straight install into /usr/local.
The _par.h files are by convention parameters and not protoypes (and
simply inherited the fortran name).
So long as grp.h is renamed it doesn't really matter what happens.
--
Tim Jenness
JAC software
http://www.jach.hawaii.edu/~timj
|