JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for JISC-SHIBBOLETH Archives


JISC-SHIBBOLETH Archives

JISC-SHIBBOLETH Archives


JISC-SHIBBOLETH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

JISC-SHIBBOLETH Home

JISC-SHIBBOLETH Home

JISC-SHIBBOLETH  October 2005

JISC-SHIBBOLETH October 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Shibboleth SP for BlueSocket WLAN access products

From:

james sankar <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion list for Shibboleth developments <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:44:20 +1000

Content-Type:

multipart/mixed

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (121 lines) , james sankar.vcf (1 lines)

Hi Jon (and John)

I agree that there is a concern surrounding spoofing to collect
credentials from a rogue AP broadcasting the eduroam SSID and webpage
redirect.  This is the reason for LIN and eduroam pushing for 802.1X
with EAP/TTLS to create an encrypted tunnel between the client, AP, and
RADIUS servers whereby a properly installed certificate on the client
ensures that only credentials are sent to the correct home organisation
RADIUS server.  This does however require certificates to be installed
on each client device.  

A variety of eduroam-ng architectures are currently being explored by
the eduroam-gwg-sc working group who are considering RADIUS mesh
architectures and the development of a RADIUS server discovery feature
with RADIATOR to overcome hierarchy dependency.  Other work is looking
at finer grained authorisation (e.g. LICHEN) and ways to incorporate
shibboleth into 802.1x (much longer term).  

The reality is that as various solutions develop iteratively and mature
we are beginning to fix weaknesses and develop ways to interoperate
which can only be a good thing.  It is just a bit fluid right now and I
personally believe that we don't have one AAI that confidently covers
everyone's needs.

Best Regards

James Sankar

-----------------------------
Project Leader 
Applications and Services
AARNet Pty Ltd
Canberra, Australia

Tel: 02 6222 3538
Fax: 02 6222 3535
Mobile: 0422 007 466
email: [log in to unmask]
SIP:[log in to unmask]

-----Original Message-----
From: Paschoud,J [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Friday, 21 October 2005 9:49 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Shibboleth SP for BlueSocket WLAN access products

If Jon's analysis is correct (I'm not expert on that stuff either), I
think he highlights an important distinction between Web redirect
methods like Shibboleth, and LIN/Eduroam.  
 
It's a notable strength of Shibboleth that usernames, passwords (and
other credentials for 'stronger' AuthN where required) are *only* shared
between the end-user and the host organisation (IdP) with which he
already has a personal trust relationship.
 
I'm sure that LIN when operated by universities will take good care of
such credentials.  But users should still be concerned if they will be
sharing passwords where they shouldn't.
 
John
LSE Library

________________________________

From: Discussion list for Shibboleth developments on behalf of Jon
Warbrick
Sent: Fri 21/10/05 12:10
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [JISC-SHIBBOLETH] Shibboleth SP for BlueSocket WLAN access
products



On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Tim Chown wrote:

> If the site joins the UKERNA LIN, it can use whatever local backend it
> likes - in this case the Bluesocket device would communicate to a
local
> RADIUS server (for local users) or via the national RADIUS proxy to
the
> server in the visiting user's home institution.

What your talk yesterday in Edinburgh (for which many thanks, BTW)
seemed
to confirm to me is that the current LIN approach seems to be limited to
using passwords and to require users to disclose their password on
request
to LIN infrastructure at a site that they are visiting and then to have
it
bounced across the country via a network of RADIUS proxies. I'm
concerned
that users will not be able to correctly judge when they should and
should
not divulge this password (making it vulnerable to theft) nor be able to
evaluate the safety of the forwarding mechanism (though in practise I'd
expect this to be safe). As a result I'm concerned that LIN-based
authentication will be extremely week.

Web-redirect systems, and Shibboleth when using such for the local
authentication, have the advantage that a user should only need to
divulge
their password, or other credentials, to a web site run by their home
institution with which they are probably already familiar. It seems to
me
that this should result in somewhat stronger authentication.

> It's likely the LIN will push early for 802.1x deployment rather than
> web-redirect.

I don't yet know enough about 802.1x, but I think I'm about to have to
learn...

Jon.

--
Jon Warbrick
Web/News Development, Computing Service, University of Cambridge



Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

November 2023
February 2023
January 2023
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
June 2022
January 2022
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager