You should be directing your comments to the person who initiated this - Michael.
the idea that academia is inclusive is a non-starter for me.
On 13 Oct 2005 at 17:59, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> Dear David and Michael,
>
> If you wish to continue this somewhat tedious little spat could you please
> onfine it to your own personal emails accounts rather than inflicting it on the
> rest of the list.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kim Marshall
>
> Quoting David Quarter <[log in to unmask]>:
>
> > Michael,
> >
> > I know what you were alluding to. I just needed you to say it as it was
> > almost too
> > ridiculous to repeat.
> >
> > If you honestly think that academia is inclusivive,
> > either you've lived in the environment too long; or you;ve never been outside
> > an
> > academic environment to know what inclusiveness should entail. Academia is a
> > sanctuary for the spoiled, the pampered, and the "bright and intelligent" -
> > or at least,
> > those so defined. To suggest otherwise is to be completely clouded by your
> > profession(?).
> >
> > DOQ
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 13 Oct 2005 at 14:05, Michael Peckitt wrote:
> >
> > > My point was that I find questionable that your remark being directed
> > > towards academia made everything ok, as if being directed twards an
> > > institution was more acceptable than a remarked being directed against one
> > > person. Neither is necessairly acceptable.
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > And it being directed at academia makes perfectly acceptable?
> > > > >
> > > > > Michael Gillan Peckitt BA MA
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >From: David Quarter <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > > >Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
> > > > > >To: [log in to unmask]
> > > > > >Subject: Re: Journal of Medical Humanities - Disability issue
> > > > > >Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:09:05 -0400
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My remark wasn't directed to any one person as opposed to academia
> > > > >
> > > > > ________________End of message______________________
> > > > >
> > > > > Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
> > > > > are now located at:
> > > > >
> > > > > www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
> > > > >
> > > > > You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
> > > >
> > > >________________End of message______________________
> > > >
> > > >Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
> > > >are now located at:
> > > >
> > > >www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
> > > >
> > > >You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
> > >
> > > ________________End of message______________________
> > >
> > > Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
> > > are now located at:
> > >
> > > www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
> > >
> > > You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
> >
> > ________________End of message______________________
> >
> > Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
> > are now located at:
> >
> > www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
> >
> > You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
> >
>
>
________________End of message______________________
Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
|