Dear Justin,
Unfortunately you cannot have a single resonance assigned to both betas.
The way the data model is made, you can only have a single resonance to
nuclei that are magnetically identical, like CH3 groups. For betas you
have to have two resonsnces that just happen to have identical chemical
shifts. Doing it this way makes it easier to handle a lot of other things,
like constraint generation or like the situation where the betas are not
identical after all in all circumstances.
As for assigning all the other betas to hb3, I cannot give a proper answer
- maybe Tim can.
Cheers,
Rasmus
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Rasmus H. Fogh Email: [log in to unmask]
Dept. of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge,
80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK. FAX (01223)766002
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, Justin T Douglas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some isochronous h-betas and if I assign them
> to the ambiguous hb* I notice that Analysis creates a
> brand new resonance and assigns that to one of the
> stereospecific betas (in this specific case hb2).
> Then all my resonances everywhere else are assigned to
> the other beta (hb3).
>
> I'm not sure if this behavior is intentional or not.
> I don't think I want two resonances. I just want one
> assigned to both betas.
>
> ***
>
> By the way is there interest amongst the other
> analysis users to be able to sort resonances in the
> resonance browser by spin systems? I don't know how
> difficult something like that is to implement.
>
>
> J
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
|