Hi Howard,
I think its not quite that simple because its not just the
Meta-data its the aggregations themselves. I would argue
that ff only Meta-data approaches are used we miss taking advantage
of commonalities of functionality across different aggregation
formats.
IEEE ltsc has started work on a solution to this - the
Resource Aggregation Model for Learning Education and Training.
The Public Information document on this is on the very edge
of being released, we're just tidying up the details of
formatting of contributors attributions. It will appear on
http://www.ieeeltsc.org/wg11CMI/ramlet/
It won't help a huge amount at this point with your problem
if you need the solution now or yesterday but it does point
out the functionality that we hope will solve this in the
near future.
I'll try find out on this evening's conference call the
precise date the PI doc will appear and if you want me
to update you on that if you email me tomorrow to remind
me I hope I can reply with the date. There will be widespread
publicity anyway (Wilbert Kraan is writing the publicity
but I think he's travelling this week).
Cheers
andy
> Does anyone have a good reference/ link to a metadata mapping exercise
> i.e. considering object type (image, movie, data set etc.) which schema
> is recommended (i.e. MODS, DC, LOM, DDI, etc)
>
> We are building metadata repository services and need to ingest and
> export to multiple formats then search across them.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Howard Noble
> Educational Interoperability Specialist
>
> Oxford University, Learning Technologies Group (LTG)
> 13 Banbury Rd, Oxford. OX2 6NN. England
> Tel. +44 (0)1865 273281 internal 73281
> email: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
--
andy
___________________
Andy Heath
[log in to unmask]
|