On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 03:32:36PM +0100 or thereabouts, William Hay wrote:
> > --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 12:50:51PM +0100 or thereabouts, Alessandra Forti wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > a VObox security policy document has been released today.
> > >
> > > https://edms.cern.ch/document/639856/
> > >
> > > Since it will be part of the discussion at the operation workshop, any
> > > comment is apreciated.
> >
> > Yesterday at the GridPP Deployment with the help of the T2 co-ordinators
> > we created a response to VO boxes.
> >
> > A pdf is attached. Again comments are welcome.
> >
> > I want to pass this up the chain though before the end of the day if possible.
> >
> > Steve
> The pdf says "Unless VO services are defined and agreed the VOBoxes will not be
> provided by sites". The use of passive voice makes it hard to determine if
> the agreement in question is intended to be between individual sites/VOs
> or collectively between all sites/VOs.
At the end of the day it will always be the site who can choose to run
or not run such a thing. I am definitely expecting some sites in the UK
will not run these things and at the very least VOs will be dropped from
sites north, south, london and scot if they become mandatory to support a
VO.
>
> William Hay
--
Steve Traylen
[log in to unmask]
http://www.gridpp.ac.uk/
|