On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, Alasdair Allan wrote:
>> Looking at the message below it may be worth trying to turn this around and
>> link using g95 and then pull in the g77 dependencies explicitly (_s_copy is
>> from libg2c.dylib).
>
> That didn't seem to cut it, although I'm confused why not...
>
>> However, if you just want JPL, I'd get the latest dist tarball and rebuild
>> that using g95 (as it has no dependencies it should be trivial, just define
>> FC=g95, and link against the static library).
>
> Which means I try this on Monday I guess...
Or just take Tim's offer of a /star copy!
Cheers,
Peter.
|