Hi Steve,
I have no idea at what stage it was installed I'm afraid. I try to
install the bare minimum at the SL install stage but as usual get a load
of stuff I don't want (the machine was freshly installed last night so
nothing has been installed since).
Cheers,
Michael.
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Steve Traylen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 12:07:23PM +0100 or thereabouts, Michael George wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > When installing CEs and WNs with the 2.6.0 software I encountered
> > rpm conflicts caused by lam and mpich at the
> >
> > /opt/lcg/yaim/scripts/install_node stage
>
>
> >
> > To solve this we simply did rpm -e lam and reran the install
> > script. I have two questions:
> >
> > 1) Could this lead to trouble in the future?
> >
> > 2) I presume other people have come across this so how come I have seen no
> > mention of it in mailing lists?
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Do you know how lam got installed in the first place. Could be something
> that was installed locally and so other people won't have seen it. It
> is still a problem though.
>
> Steve
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Michael.
>
>
|