JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MINING-HISTORY Archives


MINING-HISTORY Archives

MINING-HISTORY Archives


mining-history@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MINING-HISTORY Home

MINING-HISTORY Home

MINING-HISTORY  July 2005

MINING-HISTORY July 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Groverake mine

From:

Bob & Annette Orchard <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

The mining-history list.

Date:

Sun, 17 Jul 2005 10:34:08 +1200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (103 lines)

Hi,
    just a few comments on trying to protect mining artifacts from the
vandals & scrap men, not to mention mining memorabilia & mineral collectors.
Having been through this at the Geevor Tin Mine site, during its transition
from working mine to heritage site.

It is virtually impossible to stop these people,  the only way at times is
having to resort to physically removing them from the site. The police are
not a lot of help either, depending on the views of the officers that turn
up. Some will tell you to take the offender around the corner & give them a
good beating (using sufficient force to restrain is the official term) then
call the police, while other officers will inform you that by merely having
a pick hilt with you (which is a tool in the mining world) that you are
indeed carrying an offensive weapon.

This is how the steam winding engine at Geevor Victory shaft is still
there!!

Putting obstacles in the way also does not work, I used blocks of concrete
approx 1.5M x 1.5M x 1.5M, which were easily moved by the scrap men's truck
/ hi-hab.  A better solution is to dig deep ditches, as these are more
difficult to negotiate.
The Geevor site was particularly difficult to protect, as it was traversed
by several public rights-of-way. I have apprehended persons (ostensibly
"just walking through") but carrying with them, wrecking bar, saw & an
axe.....

Locked steel gates / steel posts with reversed hinges (so that is impossible
to lift the gates off the hinges) also no real obstacle to the gas cutting
torch. (I came to work one morning to find the gates cut off the hinges &
laying flat on the ground, the scrap men's truck having driven over the top
of them to gain access to the large power cables from the substation to the
Victory shaft winder (all in cable trenches & easy to remove).

A good way to stop / catch the offenders if you happen to detect them on a
site is to first let down all the tires of their vehicle (if you can get
close enough without being seen) then call the police; so that the offenders
can be caught red handed, but even then the police are very reluctant to
want to take  action.

Even having a night watchman is no guarantee against vandalism, as one man
on a large site cannot be everywhere.

This is indeed a difficult problem for disused industrial sites, as there is
often little or no funding. Listing is only a protection from respectable
operators, it is no use what ever against the cowboy scrap men as they can
be in on site, cut up a piece of equipment & be away very quickly. But by
then the damage is done, as it is extremely unlikely that it will be found,
& even if it is the way in which scrap men cut things up is not the same as
if an engineer is cutting something to expedite its dismantling for removal
/ re-erection purposes.

I think that one of the best approaches is to try and tidy up the site,
treat / paint steel work & other structures, replace broken glass & give the
site a used / cared for look.

Bob.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Simon Chapman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 6:13 AM
Subject: Groverake mine


> I suggest the headgear remaining should legally protected by Listing and
> suitable physical obstacles put in the way of road access to the site to
> make it as difficult as possible to get unauthorised motor vehicles
anywhere
> near it. In addition a programme of maintenance of the headgear by local
> authority and/or local heritage organisations would need to be arranged.
>
> Without even referring to Adrian Pearce's list, other remaining headgears
in
> Co. Durham include the wooden one at Beamish Open Air Museum (NZ 219 543),
> steel at Washington F Pit Museum (NZ 302 574) and another steel one at
North
> Dalton water pumping station (NZ 408 477).
>
> During the 1990's I managed to get the historic Keope winding tower of
1922
> at Murton Colliery preserved by Listing. Unfortunately Easington District
> Council didn't quite agree, being afraid that the retention of such a
> feature from the bad old past might deter new job opportunities, so it was
> de-Listed and demolished. Now the site is grassed over and empty while
> nearby Dalton Park shopping extravaganda occupies the site of the former
pit
> heap.
>
> A headgear is a rare feature in Britain now, we should do our best to keep
> the few we have left.
>
> Simon.
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.16/50 - Release Date: 15/07/05
>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
October 2022
September 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager