We've got access to MoM demos in Leeds through accenture and coudl possibly get a formal link to negotiate some path development. MoM are speaking at CPD4IT next week, 11th at the College. I'll try to see what I can do.
http://www.cpd4it.org.uk
Rick
Dr Rick Jones
Clinical Biochemistry & Immunology
Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust
Leeds General Infirmary
Great George St
Leeds
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]
Tel: 0113 392 2340
Fax: 0113 392 5174
LS1 3EX
http://www.ychi.leeds.ac.uk
>>> [log in to unmask] 06/30/05 1:34 pm >>>
Hi John
We have been attempting to pilot MoM in Harrogate the problems at the
moment is that it is not yet locally configurable '/ linkable to other
systems. (Accenture, who are heading up the NE Cluster) have said they
will try to address the issues but the project keeps disappearing into
black holes. ie everyone clams up and the feed back dries up. The
project was withdrawn once in December last year and reinstated in April
- no timescale yet on configurability.at least in the NE yet - If you
would like to collaborate and can get configurability in the south let
me know.
mike.
-----Original Message-----
From: IT working group of the Association of Clinical Biochemists
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of O'Connor John (Royal Devon
and Exeter Foundation Trust)
Sent: 30 June 2005 12:06
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: SIG
Thanks Muir
Look forward to getting that communication. On another point, I have
been at
the Royal College of Surgeons Informaics Symposium for the last couple
of
days. We had a very interesting presentation regarding the map of
medicine
which apperently the Southern Cluster has a license agreement to use.
Are
you aware of anyone wishing to pilot its use in a routine setting?. We
would
be interested to locally customising it, and linkin it in to our
pathology
handbook which already links to lab tests online.
Cheers
Jojn
-----Original Message-----
From: IT working group of the Association of Clinical Biochemists
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Muir Gray
Sent: 26 June 2005 10:29
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: SIG
The importance of your collective contribution to the whol;e of the
programme should notbe underetimated
Will ask ben toth to contact you about our new web site and services
muir
On 20/6/05 08:49, "O'Connor John (Royal Devon and Exeter Foundation
Trust)"
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Muir, the National Clinical Toolbox sounds brilliant but perhaps gives
the
> SIG a rather grander status than it would otherwise seserve. But
personally
> I would be happy to run with this.
> I tried to set up the SIG over the weekend on
> http://www.informatics.nhs.uk/index.html
> also left a message on http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/
> But all the links to NHSIA no longer seem to exist and
connectingforhealth
> seems to be dis-connected, can anyone advise as to the best person to
> contact.
>
> Cheers
> John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IT working group of the Association of Clinical Biochemists
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Muir Gray
> Sent: 18 June 2005 10:24
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: SIG
>
>
> What about
>
> The National Clinical Toolbox
>
>
> On 17/6/05 16:03, "Jonathan Kay" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> I'd still like to have an approach (and title) that got clinicians
>> involved as well as laboratory staff. Nearly all of the important
>> issues (KM (handbooks, guidelines), process reengineering
(computerised
>> requesting by clinicians, escalation of reports, new communications
>> media)) affect both groups, and discussions are of limited impact if
>> one group isn't at the party.
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> On 17 Jun 2005, at 14:38, O'Connor John (Royal Devon and Exeter
>> Foundation Trust) wrote:
>>
>>> Ok how about just calling it "Laboratory Medicine", this is in line
>>> with the
>>> naming of other SIG's on the website.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> John
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: IT working group of the Association of Clinical Biochemists
>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Jonathan Kay
>>> Sent: 17 June 2005 13:33
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: SIG Group
>>>
>>>
>>> Interesting idea, thanks.
>>>
>>> Two immediate thoughts
>>>
>>> 1 Please can we call this "Laboratory Medicine"?
>>>
>>> 2 I've recently been at two Laboratory Medicine conferences that
have
>>> been turned around by presentations from clinicians. Is there a risk
of
>>> not covering the core issue of our contribution to clinical decision
>>> making if we set up such a group with a slightly too small remit?
How
>>> about something like an "Investigations SIG"?
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>> On 17 Jun 2005, at 13:27, O'Connor John (Royal Devon and Exeter
>>> Foundation Trust) wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Chaps
>>>>
>>>> How do you feel about having a Path Informatics Special Interest
Group
>>>> on
>>>> the http://www.informatics.nhs.uk/index.htmlwebsite. I would be
happy
>>>> to set
>>>> one up if you think it would be useful. The description below is
cut
>>>> and
>>>> pasted from the website
>>>>
>>>> "A key component of this site is its special interest groups,
hosted
>>>> by
>>>> groups wishing to promote a subject or area of activity. These
groups
>>>> can be
>>>> 'open' to all or 'restricted' to those accepted by the groups'
>>>> leaders.
>>>>
>>>> Do you want to create a Special Interest Group ?
>>>>
>>>> Each special interest group provides news, event information,
>>>> documents,
>>>> discussions, polls and the opportunity to interact in many
different
>>>> ways.
>>>> Those wishing to establish a group may do so at no cost, but are
>>>> obliged to
>>>> keep the site interesting and up to date, posting news, uploading
>>>> documents
>>>> and providing expert input to discussions etc"
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> John
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust / Craven, Harrogate & Rural District PCT
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of either of the above organisations.
This message is confidential and may contain privileged information intended only for the addressee and must not be copied or delivered or its contents disclosed to anyone other than the addressee. If you have received this E-mail in error please notify us immediately by E-mail returning the original message to the sender.
The above organisations reserve the right to monitor, intercept and (where appropriate) read all incoming and outgoing communications. By replying to this message you are taken as being aware of and giving consent to such monitoring, interception and reading.
|