JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-ELIB Archives


LIS-ELIB Archives

LIS-ELIB Archives


LIS-ELIB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-ELIB Home

LIS-ELIB Home

LIS-ELIB  June 2005

LIS-ELIB June 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Newly Enhanced Registry of Open Access Repositories (ROAR)

From:

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 11 Jun 2005 01:22:02 +0100

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (194 lines)

             ** Apologies for Cross-Posting **

Southampton's worldwide Registry of Institutional Open Access Archives
    http://archives.eprints.org/eprints.php?action=browse
created and maintained by Tim Brody and now in existence for about two
years has just been enhanced (and will soon be enhanced further) by Tim.

The Registry covers the 434 OAI-compliant OA Archives worldwide whose
existence has thus far been made known. As it is intended to cover OA
content (i.e., full-texts of either (1) preprints or (2) postprints of
peer-reviewed journal articles, or (3) dissertations), Archives that
do not provide *any* full-text content at all (only metadata), or that
provide only content of other kinds (internal documents, courseware,
library records, audio, video, software) are not covered -- though
archives of *mixed* content (both OA and non-OA) are covered. The Registry
also covers only archives that are OAI-compliant, hence interoperable,
harvestable using the OAI harvesting protocol.

[The Registry's intentional non-coverage of non-OA Archives is the
reason why it covers only 434 Archives with about 3.5 million records
(estimated from the fact that its 2.5 million records come from the
312/434 Archives that celestial can currently harvest) rather than
the full 487 Archives and 5.5 million records covered by OAIster
http://oaister.umdl.umich.edu/o/oaister/ ]

Southampton's Institutional OA Archives Registry not only tracks the
growth in the number of OA Archives worldwide across time, but it also
tracks the growth in their contents (i.e., the number of records in each
archive, across time), showing growth charts for each Archive, as well
as across Archives.

The size and growth data are also classified by the type of Archive:

    (i) Distributed Institutional/Departmental Pre-/Postprint Archives (212), 
    (ii) Central Cross-Research Archives (55)
    (iii) Dissertation Archives (e-theses) (54)

as well as

    (iv) database Archives (e.g. research data) (8)
    (v) e-journal/e-publishing Archives (39)
    (vi) demonstration Archives (not yet operational) (24)
    (vii) "other" Archives (non-OA content of various kinds) (42)

Where the content is mixed, and there is *some* OA content, the Archive
is classified as (i) - (vi).

The Archives are also classified by country and by the kind of software
used to create them.

There are also data on the total number of records in each individual
Archive, the total number of records across all Archives (and Archives
in each category) and the average number of records per Archive and
Archive category.

The record numbers are somewhat deceptive, however, because, as noted,
not all records correspond to OA objects (pre/postprints and theses), and
not all OA records are full-text. In fact, the majority of records are
almost certainly *not* OA full-texts. Estimates of the proportions will,
we hope, soon be available, as Tim works on an algorithm for identifying
generating separate counts for OA full-texts.

In addition, for 122/434 Archives their records cannot yet be
counted and monitored at all because they are not yet harvestable by
http://celestial.eprints.org. (Archive managers are strongly urged to
consult the Registry and if their records are not being harvested by
celestial, to contact Tim to remedy this: sometimes the problem is that
they have not provided the right OAI Base URL, or any at all).

The Registry also makes it possible to make some very interesting
projections, predictions and comparisons, but as you make them,
please bear in mind that they are still tempered by one major source
of uncertainty: If two Archives or Archive categories differ in their
proportion of OA full-texts, you may be comparing apples and oranges
when you compare the size and growth curve of their contents!

Needless to say, any OA Archives that are not yet in the Registry are
urged to register at http://archives.eprints.org/eprints.php?action=add
and to ensure that they are harvestable by celestial.

Currently, 15% of the annual 2.5 million articles published in the world's
24,000 journals have been made OA by being self-archived by their authors.
The Archives also contain dissertations, non-OA material, and non-full-texts
(metadata only), but their overall percentage of full-text OA is probably
higher than 15%, and for some individual Archives and kinds of Archives,
a good deal higher than 15%.

Note also that the two fullest and fastest-growing institutional
archives of all in terms of annual full-text OA content:

    I: the CERN Archive
http://archives.eprints.org/eprints.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcdsweb.cern.ch%2F

    and 

    II: the Southampton ECS Archive
http://archives.eprints.org/eprints.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Feprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk%2F

happen to be the only two Archives at institutions that have adopted
and implemented a mandatory self-archiving policy for all of their own
annual journal article output. Both are now self-archiving over 90%
of their research output.

The implication is obvious: Other institutions should adopt mandatory self-archiving
policies too:

    http://www.eprints.org/signup/sign.php

The demonstrated success of the CERN and Southampton policies -- together
with the results of the latest survey of authors across disciplines
and worldwide, which found that 81% of authors respond that  they will
self-archive *willingly* if required (but not if not); 14% say they will
comply reluctantly and only 5% say they will not comply

        Swan, Alma and Brown, Sheridan (2005) Open access self-archiving:
        An author study. Technical Report, Joint Information
        Systems Committee (JISC), UK FE and HE funding councils.
        http://cogprints.org/4385/

and both CERN and Southampton have services to do the few keystrokes
for those authors who feel they haven't the time:

        Carr, L. and Harnad, S. (2005) Keystroke Economy:
        A Study of the Time and Effort Involved in
        Self-Archiving. http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/10688/

        "Let Us Archive It For You!"
        http://eprints.st-andrews.ac.uk/proxy_archive.html
        http://software.eprints.org/handbook/libraries.php

So (a) have a look at the new, enhanced Institutional OA Archives
Registry, (b) register your own Institutional Archive if it's not in
there, (c) create one (or persuade your institution to create one)
if you don't have one yet -- it's cheap and easy

       Sponsler. E. & Van de Velde E. (2001) Eprints.org
       Software: A Review.  SPARC E-News, October 2
       2001. http://www.arl.org/sparc/pubs/enews/aug01.html#6
http://archives.eprints.org/eprints.php?action=search&query=caltech&submit=Search

especially relative to the dramatically increased research impact (and
research impact income) that OA has been demonstrated to provide

       http://citebase.eprints.org/isi_study/
       http://www.crsc.uqam.ca/lab/chawki/ch.htm
       http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html

and urge your institution to adopt a self-archiving policy if it
hasn't one, preferably one that requires self-archiving rather than
merely encouraging it. What needs to grow is not just the number of
institutions with OA Archives (212) but the number with institutional
OA self-archiving policies:

    http://www.eprints.org/signup/fulllist.php

Amen.

Stevan Harnad

P.S. I'm not really proposing to call the Registry "ROAR"! The
term was chosen advisedly, however, to register clearly the
fact that the Registry exists, has existed for some time,
and is conveying a steadily growing amount of innovative and
important information. It needs to be built upon, not bypassed.
(Cf. http://www.researchinformation.info/rimayjun05open_access.html )

AMERICAN SCIENTIST OPEN ACCESS FORUM:
A complete Hypermail archive of the ongoing discussion of providing
open access to the peer-reviewed research literature online (1998-2005)
is available at:
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/
        To join or leave the Forum or change your subscription address:
http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/American-Scientist-Open-Access-Forum.html
        Post discussion to:
        [log in to unmask]

UNIVERSITIES: If you have adopted or plan to adopt an institutional
policy of providing Open Access to your own research article output,
please describe your policy at:
        http://www.eprints.org/signup/sign.php

UNIFIED DUAL OPEN-ACCESS-PROVISION POLICY:
    BOAI-1 ("green"): Publish your article in a suitable toll-access journal
            http://romeo.eprints.org/
OR
    BOAI-2 ("gold"): Publish your article in a open-access journal if/when 
            a suitable one exists.
            http://www.doaj.org/
AND  
    in BOTH cases self-archive a supplementary version of your article
            in your institutional repository.
            http://www.eprints.org/self-faq/
            http://archives.eprints.org/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
January 2024
December 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
February 2022
December 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
May 2021
September 2020
October 2019
March 2019
February 2019
August 2018
February 2018
December 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
June 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
November 2016
August 2016
July 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
September 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager