On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 08:24:43 +0100, Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
>Q1. Do you support the proposal to drop the "Physical
>Characteristics"/dc:format property from the DC CD AP. Answer Yes/No
Yes.
>Q2. Is recording the format of the items within the collection significant
>for meeting the functional requirements of the DC CD AP? Answer Yes/No.
Yes.
>If you answered "Yes" to Q2, then answer Q3 and Q4
>
>Q3. How should information about the format of the items within the
>collection be represented? Select from:
>
>(a) use a property to represent the notion that the collection contains
>items of some format (e.g. cld:itemFormat)
>(b) use a new property to represent the notion that the collection contains
>some item, and then use dc:format to represent the format of the item
>(c) other (please specify)
>(d) don't know but we need to do it somehow!
(d)
>Q4. Should we shelve this issue for the initial version of the DC CD AP?
>i.e. note it as an "open issue" that needs work in the future, but not
>incorporate this in the first version of the DC CD AP. Answer Yes/No.
Yes.
Pete
|