JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for EAST-WEST-RESEARCH Archives


EAST-WEST-RESEARCH Archives

EAST-WEST-RESEARCH Archives


EAST-WEST-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EAST-WEST-RESEARCH Home

EAST-WEST-RESEARCH Home

EAST-WEST-RESEARCH  April 2005

EAST-WEST-RESEARCH April 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Slovenian intellectual with rock-star status brings out adoring fans

From:

"Serguei Alex. Oushakine" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Serguei Alex. Oushakine

Date:

Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:04:15 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (199 lines)

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/04/24/MNGDTCEA9D1.DTL

Slovenian intellectual with rock-star status brings out adoring fans
Philosophy's his game, but so is provoking academics and the masses

- Reyhan Harmanci, Chronicle Staff Writer

Sunday, April 24, 2005


Slavoj Zizek -- philosopher, author, former presidential candidate of
Slovenia, cult hero -- sat on a chair in front of a packed house at the
Roxie Cinema looking oddly small.

The intellectual giant came to San Francisco last week for the world
premiere of a documentary -- "Zizek!" -- that fervently bears his name and a
post-screening where his fans were eager to hear the views of this
improbable hero.
Without any paid publicity, the filmmakers relied on word-of-mouth to fill
the theater. It was a safe bet. The last time Zizek was in the Bay Area in
2003, he sold out appearances in Berkeley and San Francisco. "We counted on
getting a good crowd in San Francisco," said director Astra Taylor,
explaining that Zizek's left-wing politics and social activism mirror the
ideals of many in the Bay Area. "It was the perfect place to show the film
for the first time publicly."

Zizek is a rare creature, a cultural theorist who, according to one fan at
the screening, "makes Hegel and Kant comprehensible." He has published more
than 50 books -- most of them combining the psychoanalytic techniques of the
notoriously unintelligible French theorist Jacques Lacan with Marxist social
and political thinking.

He examines a breathtaking array of subjects: Hitchcock films, Christianity,
cognitive functions and, perhaps most famously, the events of Sept. 11 and
the war in Iraq. All in service to raising -- without answering -- big
philosophical questions about the nature of humanity.

Not exactly rock star material.

And as the diminutive version of the giant bear-faced man, with scraggly
beard and sunken eyes, sat below the spot where moments before a giant
cinematic version of himself had loomed, Zizek looked positively average.

When he started speaking, his voice rose, and his hands flew up, and he
started spitting and sweating. As he applied his compulsive analysis to the
documentary, there was no doubting his gifts as a showman. The audience was
rapt as he insisted on his paltry role as a "philosopher, with, really,
modest aims."

The transformation -- from small to large, serious to silly, quiet to
loud -- reflected the contradiction that is Zizek -- the esoteric scholar
who became a public icon with a global following; the obtuse writer whom one
British critic called "the Elvis of cultural theory"; the serious ideologue
who wrote copy for the Abercrombie & Fitch catalog; the captivating speaker
whose voice and speech patterns, according to a New Yorker profile, most
closely resemble the late Andy Kaufman's Latka character in the television
show "Taxi."

While holding the admittedly meaningless title of senior researcher at the
University of Ljubljana in his native Slovenia, Zizek has reached the
broadest audience in the United States with his most recent books "Welcome
to the Desert of the Real: Five Essays on September 11 and Related Dates"
(2002) -- whose title is lifted from the film "The Matrix" -- and "Iraq: The
Borrowed Kettle" (2004).

His next book, to be published in 2006 by MIT Press, is called "The Parallax
View." "It's a big book," he says, "over 600 pages." He plans to bring
together threads of cognitive science, biogenetics, politics, the problem of
freedom and an analysis of Kierkegaard, ostensibly, for the first time ever.

His genius, according to the filmmaker, is finding often absurd connections
between popular culture and obscure academic texts, thus encouraging people
outside academia to find scholarship relevant. One of Taylor's larger goals
with this film is to show the effect Zizek has on his fans -- "to make
intellectualism exciting and fun and vital in a climate of
anti-intellectualism."
No one, even his detractors, denies that he is brilliant.

"He's a one-man jet set," says Professor Khachig Tololyan, chair of Wesleyan
University's English department. "Not every academic gets to fly around,
delivering lectures to adoring crowds. Some people may resent him, but it
would be a mistake to dismiss him."
An employee of City Lights Bookstore, Karl Bauer, 26, recalls the reading
Zizek gave in September 2003 as a mob scene. "We had to turn people away,
the lines were so long." Bauer says that the last time he heard Zizek speak
in New York, the police cane to deal with unruly fans who didn't make it
inside.

Zizek's attitude toward his fame, like his attitude about any subject, is
relentlessly articulated and exceedingly contradictory. In one memorable
scene in the documentary, he's in a park in Buenos Aires when a woman
approaches him with a book to sign. He acquiesces, but a few minutes later,
grinning, he claims to hate the attention.

Taylor, the director, can be heard saying, "Really? You don't enjoy that
even a little?" "No," he grouses, backing away, "she should bother me at the
lecture."

The disconnect between what he's saying and his look of abashed joy is
deeply funny; the audience at the screening howled. At other times, though,
his discomfort with being a public figure seems genuine.

It's all part of the same contradiction inherent in Zizek: balancing the
role of populist entertainer with serious scholar whose insights matter.
In his brief talk after the movie, Zizek repeated the point that he saw
himself as a philosopher with somewhat narrow aims. "It's strange," he said,
his hands taking flight again, "even people who don't agree with me seem to
expect that I'll have the big answers."
"You know, when the pope died, and they got a new pope, all these European
journals asked me to write this or that, to comment on the new pope," Zizek
said as the audience chuckled, anticipating the punch line. "What do I know
about the pope? Same thing with the tsunami! What do I know!"

For fans like Bauer, Zizek's ability to write and speak in terms familiar to
the general population, not just Lacanians, are what make his work so
powerful. "I was in New York on Sept. 11, and I felt like I was watching a
movie, an action movie, it was what Zizek was talking about -- more 'real'
than real," Bauer says.

Zizek's popularity raises a question: Does writing for a broader audience
necessitate losing academic rigor? Has he really, as he claims in the
documentary, lost influence in the American university system?

No, says Jane Gallop, a noted English professor at the University of
Wisconsin-Milwaukee, who has written extensively about French psychoanalyst
Jacque Lacan and feminism. Many academics over the past decade have
attempted to broaden their relevance.
While Gallop says that she isn't personally as successful in the endeavor,
people such as Henry Louis Gates, bell hooks and Judith Butler have been.
While she hasn't read Zizek much herself, she believes he is "very
influential in the academy."

For some scholars, though, his import has diminished as he's traded
sustained academic work for cultural commentary.
Tololyan says that Zizek is not taught very often at Wesleyan, even in his
Reading Theories class. "Personally, although I have a tremendous amount of
respect for him and think he is a very, very smart man, I don't feel like I
have to read him right now," he says. "I'm a scholar, that's my vocation,
and he hasn't produced a sustained work of scholarship for quite some time."
Tololyan says he is making a distinction between intellectuals and scholars.

"Intellectuals are not necessarily scholars; they don't have professional
qualifications in many cases," he says. Similarly, most scholars are
professional academics, and while their work has intellectual content, they
are not intellectuals who use their knowledge base to generate engaged
commentary around the world.

"Zizek is both a scholar and an intellectual who has turned into a cultural
columnist," he says. "The problem is that much of his current intellectual
and cultural commentary is not underpinned or authorized by a deep knowledge
of what he writes about. But he's so smart and engaging, and also so much a
myth that he gets by."

UC Berkeley German lecturer Christina Gerhardt also acknowledges that she
doesn't often hear substantive discussions of Zizek's work in academic
circles. "He's talked about more in terms of being a phenomenon or a
personal," she says.
Zizek himself sees no contradiction in his ability to meld the popular with
the esoteric. He has accepted the post of international director of a
recently created center for public intellectuals at the University of
London's Birkbeck College.

"One of my main aims in my work has been to bring philosophical thinking to
the general public -- this intellectual tradition still exists in
Continental Europe," he says. "My writing appears in daily and weekly
newspapers and journals. But not here."
Immediately, though, he can't resist contradicting himself. "But that might
be changing!" he says. "I mean, even my friend Judith Butler (a UC Berkeley
professor of rhetoric), in her last few books, has been changing her
approach. And look at Noam Chomsky -- all but ignored by big media, he is
still a huge figure in this country."

For bookstore worker Bauer, the criticism heaped on Zizek from inside
academia misses the point. "Who has the time or inclination to read a
400-page academic work?" Bauer asks. "The academy isn't where anyone is
paying attention -- he manages to transcend the academy without losing his
integrity."

Zizek's analysis of himself is perhaps the greatest expression of his
contrarian nature.

At one point in the film, he expresses contempt for intellectuals "who
pretend they're just like other people, you know, false modesty."
A day later during a phone interview, he insists that his role in the
greater scheme is minimal. And when it was pointed out that he has a
remarkably simple e-mail address, Zizek is downright gleeful.

"I know, I tell you, I'm just a philosopher!" he says. "A peasant! A mere
peasant! Nothing more!" Just like that, in a flurry of exclamations, Zizek
gets off the phone.


Slavoj Zizek will address the San Francisco Society for Lacanian Studies at
8 p.m. Tuesday. Go to www.lacan.org for ticket information.
E-mail Reyhan Harmanci at [log in to unmask]
Page A - 1
URL:
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/04/24/MNGDTCEA9D1.DTL

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager