> >On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Tim Stevens wrote:
> >
> >> As Analysis stands at the moment however, to get around the problem I
> >> suggest assigning the peak (where you're not given the option the resonace
> >> with the mis-assigned shift) to a new resonance. Then, in the resonance
> >> browser, you can merge this new resonance with the one you really wanted
> >> to assinged to.
> >
> >This is an excellent solution - no problem.
> >
>
> The only slight problem this method reveals is that when you merge
> resonances their shifts in the ShiftLists are not automagically recalculated.
Hmm, they should be. I'll look into this.
Tim
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Tim Stevens Email: [log in to unmask]
Department of Biochemistry [log in to unmask]
University of Cambridge Phone: +44 1223 766022 (office)
80 Tennis Court Road +44 7816 338275 (mobile)
Old Addenbrooke's Site +44 1223 364613 (home)
Cambridge CB2 1GA WWWeb: http://www.bio.cam.ac.uk/~tjs23
United Kingdom http://www.pantonia.co.uk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------ +NH3CH(CH(CH3)OH)C(O)NHCH(CH(CH3)CH2CH3)C(O)NHCH(CH2CH2SCH3)CO2- -------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|