JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ALONSERPER Archives


ALONSERPER Archives

ALONSERPER Archives


ALONSERPER@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ALONSERPER Home

ALONSERPER Home

ALONSERPER  March 2005

ALONSERPER March 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: On The Metaphysics of Experimental Physics

From:

A Serper <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Whole heuristics for the study of Human subject and existence as totalities <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:16:04 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (512 lines)

No I am saying that I am a psychologist as a professional and as far as
knowledge is concerned.  I am not just a human yakker.  It is grounded within
my professional expertise and embodied knowledge.

Quoting Karl Rogers <[log in to unmask]>:

> I thought that you said that the study of human existence had to be done
> without disciplines such as psychology. Or are you now say that psychology
> provides a special insight?
>
> A Serper <[log in to unmask]> wrote:And this is why I do so as a constructive
> critical psychologist who in past work
> has extensively critiqued all existing and past heuristic tools of human
> existence and argued that an alternative needs to be constructed, that does
> not
> yet exist.
>
> Engaging with the ideas of others have shown me possibilities that I have not
> been aware of ('I', living contradiction logic, dialectic, materialistic 'I',
> living theory, living educational theory, action research, living action
> research) before. I then return as a psychologist and claim to be able to put
> forward the alternative heuristics that I searched for. I do so as a proven
> psychologist of human existence, who is also a human being, and illustrate it
> as a human being an individual who is part of the human race.
>
> I ground it within my proven/demonstrated professional expertise as a
> critical
> psychologist of human existence and as part of the human culture.
> Alon
>
>
>
> Quoting Karl Rogers :
>
> > From many of our past conversations, I know that you are driven to write
> > about your self and your struggles. It really goes without saying that I
> > fully respect your right to write about whatever concerns you. I know that
> > you feel deeply, passionately about your work, and that you have enormous
> > difficulties with life that you are confronting. I am not suggesting that
> you
> > are not committed to your own project. I know that you are. It is your
> life,
> > after all.
> > However, my criticism of you, dear Alon, is that not only is your work
> overly
> > self-obsessed but you tend to universalise your project: that we should all
> > struggle as you do. The thing is this Alon: Many of us have struggled with
> > our lives and ourselves and we have either overcome this struggle or come
> to
> > some kind of truce with ourselves. Many of us also have known pain, loss,
> > loneliness, and been lost in struggles against our own nihilism. But we
> have
> > come through it. We do not need to wallow.
> > There are some of us who have actually reached the point that you strive
> for.
> > We do not need to return to our past; it has taught us its lessons and we
> > have moved on. We are now concerned with other things. And we are happy to
> be
> > so. Let us be so.
> >
> > A Serper
> wrote:
> > I think I just pushed send by mistake before
> >
> > Hi Karl
> >
> > I do not like nor enjoy it at all. In fact, this has been a complete hell
> for
> > me. Doing so entailed enormous pain and anxieties. I had to face and
> examine
> > the possibility that I might find out that I have been a horrific, or just
> a
> > bad human being, that my life was meaningless and an illusion and
> > unproductive,
> > that some individuals’ lives and existence might have been better had I not
> > be
> > and better off without my existence here. This has been extremely scary and
> > full of angst experience.
> >
> > I have analysed and reflected on everything that happened, every little
> > detail –
> > and made a mountain out of a very small hill – which is one of the problems
> > in
> > this research. It has made my life very difficult, as it did the life of
> the
> > loved ones who chose to share their life with me.
> >
> > This is the first time I include my personal life in a project. I have
> > normally
> > very zealously kept it away. I have only done that in the last two years as
> > an
> > opportunity to take time off, to reflect and analyse and still do it in a
> > manner
> > that can be of a contribution to others and a to field and approach.
> >
> > The problem, for me, is how can I talk about individuals’ producing an
> > account
> > of their being in the world as a heuristic tool, in a manner that I think
> is
> > the best, most appropriate way to tackle human existence, without doing it
> > and
> > showing I have been doing it myself? It will be like the French priest
> > telling
> > his perish to do what he says but not what he does. How can I preach for
> > something and not do it myself? Could I be treated seriously then? Would
> this
> > fulfil the values of self-respect for myself and my work, my life project?
> > But
> > I put a word of extreme caution, and care, of the extreme difficulties
> which
> > doing so entail and the extreme inner strength that it requires and
> discussed
> > it extensively. There is nothing romantic about this project. It is a
> serious
> > emotional hell.
> >
> > I keep away very strictly from revealing and exposing and from cheap
> > ‘pornography’ and exposure. There are enough novels, magazines, tabloids,
> TV
> > shows (e.g., Jerry Springer) and reality TV for this. I am not fond of that
> > at
> > all. I talk hypothetically and merely relate generally to human issues and
> > episodes that could be grasped and shared by most if not all human beings
> in
> > common.
> >
> > I have also known love and great relationships and most incredibly
> > friendship,
> > with individuals willing to carry out personal self-sacrifice and severe
> > personal risks for me and vice versa. The last days have been rough days
> > because of uncertainty that needs to be worked out and things that make me
> > anxious and think about in making plans and commitment. It was part of
> > discussions about life-time commitment – When, How, children, how many?
> When?
> > Etc, etc and personal needs and desires. I do things that I think are very
> > meaningful and enjoy them. I am generally pleased from my findings and
> > results
> > of the project. I put a time limit on it and hope to be able to take a
> short
> > break from this type of work soon. It has really saturated and exhausted
> me.
> >
> > I think my point is similar to yours – I call upon a therapist, a
> counsellor,
> > an
> > educator to take accountability for his/her life/existence and to engage in
> > self-analysis into self-development as a human being and educate
> > himself/herself prior to educating others into becoming better, improved
> > human
> > beings.
> >
> > But self-analysis and the self include others. We need the other – How can
> we
> > analyse and examine the question of being a better partner without a
> partner,
> > a
> > better friend without friends, and better family-man/women without family?
> > Alon
> >
> >
> >
> > Quoting Karl Rogers :
> >
> > > Alon,
> > > Let me reply briefly. As you well know, there are many differences
> between
> > us
> > > about how we approach life and philosophy. That is true of us all. I know
> > > that you like to talk and write about existential uncertainty,
> complexity,
> > > and angst, in terms of your own pain and suffering. For me, it is a
> private
> > > matter. That is not to say that I do not think that you are in error by
> > > focussing upon these. It is clearly very important for you to do so and,
> > > perhaps, it is a way of healing yourself. But, I do not share this need
> to
> > > confess my pain in public. I have been very fortunate in my life and have
> > > found love and happiness with my friends and wife, side by side with the
> > > freedom to live and work freely, and have the economic security to do so.
> > > [Touch wood]. Furthermore, I have been lucky since birth and had a
> > relatively
> > > stable and liberal childhood in which I was able to freely explore both
> > > "self-self" and "self-other" relationships, as you put it, which of
> course
> > > became increasingly
> > > complicated as I grew older. I have known pain and the loss of loved
> ones,
> > > through both death and betrayal, as well as experiencing deep personal
> > > changes and the difficulties of being myself in a complex, confusing, and
> > > often contradictory world. Most of us have. So, you see Alon, I do not
> > > disagree with what you are saying, it is just the case that, as the
> English
> > > expression goes, you are teaching your grandmother how to suck eggs.
> > > Furthermore, in the last chapter of my book, I do talk about how the
> modern
> > > sciences were metaphysically postulated as a mask to cover a world in
> which
> > > fear, uncertainty, and complexity are immanent, in order to provide a
> means
> > > by which human beings could teleologically defer their angst in the face
> of
> > > the capriciousness of Nature by substituting a sense of increased
> > > technological power as a metaphor for truth and understanding. So, you
> see,
> > I
> > > do talk about these things, but, perhaps, not quite in the personal way
> > that
> > > you would like. The thing is, Alon, that this book is the culmination of
> > > fifteen years of study, in both the physical sciences and philosophy,
> that
> > > lead from a masters in physics to a doctorate in the philosophy of
> science,
> > > via a masters in philosophy (incidentally, my masters dissertation was
> > > written on technoscience and the existential subject), and there is quite
> a
> > > lot of my life that has gone into it. It is a very personal work that,
> > > hopefully, will be of interest
> > > to others.
> > > Finally, on a philosophical point of disagreement, open to considerable
> > > discussion, I simply disagree with you that the "self-self" relationship
> is
> > > prior to "self-other" relationships. I think that they go hand in hand
> > (often
> > > literally). I only really came to know myself as a distinct self through
> my
> > > relationships with others, many of which were extremely difficult and
> > > challenging, as well as pleasureable and enlightening, and, in turn, I
> was
> > > only able to successfully relate to others when once I has become
> > successful
> > > at relating to myself. It is a dialectic. And, believe me when I say that
> > it
> > > is still, very much, a work in progress...
> > > but, as the cliche goes, we are all different. Vive la difference.
> > > love, Karl.
> > >
> > > A Serper
> > wrote:
> > > Thanks for this Karl
> > >
> > > There are two elements that bother me here
> > >
> > > 1) the self-self relationship
> > > 2) Uncertainty, complexity and angst
> > >
> > > As you, you know I believe in the self-self relationship and taking
> > > accountability for oneself and one’s actions and regard the self-other
> > > relationships as part of it. Still, the self-self relationship is needed
> > for
> > > professional and ethical interactions with others.
> > >
> > > I believe the latter is useless without the former. Without this
> > > ontological critical analysis and self-study of one's ontology and being
> in
> > > an
> > > attempt to lead the most meaningful, moral and productive life feasible
> for
> > > oneself in and with the world,
> > > there is no educational process, no meaningful social relationships and
> no
> > > ethos
> > > nor ethics - nothing.
> > >
> > > The self-other relationships, in my opinion, are part of it and can
> merely
> > be
> > > pursued from within the self-self relationship. As a constructing
> > > phenomenologist, I regard the social other as a heuristics for the self
> in
> > > the
> > > question how do I lead, or learn to lead, a more meaningful existence for
> > > myself in and with the world?, using the social other and self dialogue
> > with
> > > the self as a heuristics.
> > >
> > > I believe in taking accountability for oneself, going inward before going
> > > outward to the social other.
> > >
> > > If only it were that simple. Human existence and the human condition are
> > > extremely uncertain phenomena. I am currently going through ontological
> > > difficulties myself. I have not slept for ages and this is very much
> > related
> > > to
> > > what I wish to put forward here as a thesis/monograph.
> > >
> > > I thus suggest and believe that the key thing of all, prior to social
> > > dialects
> > > and interactions that are part of it, is the relation between the self
> and
> > > itself in order to preserve, protect, love and nourish itself, its
> > > ontological
> > > security, well-being, self-respect, dignity and integrity. If not I for
> me
> > > then no one for me, as the ancient Hebrew saying goes.
> > >
> > > Life and human existence are complex and extremely uncertain. There are
> > > constant ontological and existential clashes, menaces, struggles,
> dilemmas,
> > > hazards and uncertainties that are thrown at us unexpectedly with no
> > control
> > > over, shake us and are craved for some sense, meanings, rationale, order
> > and
> > > a
> > > bit of sanity.
> > >
> > > For example the clash between love, warmth and sharing one's life and
> > > existence
> > > with a partner and not being alone against the elements of a
> > > materialistic/economic well-being, which is essential for both the
> physical
> > > and
> > > aesthetic self and being, ontological security, self-respect, ontological
> > > well-being, integrity and autonomy. The clash between the desire to be
> > > decent,
> > > supportive, offering and acting in unconditional love and support in
> order
> > to
> > > fulfil the ambition of being a good, caring and ethical being and the
> need
> > to
> > > avoid ontological suicide and pathology and a menace to one’s career and
> > > life’s
> > > ambitions.
> > >
> > > This is hell and extremely painful. But one needs to try to take and grab
> > > control analyse the situation and the possibilities, plan and think ahead
> > for
> > > the long term, analyse and follow the dialectic engagement that I propose
> > and
> > > follow his/her conscious and the desire/need to self-preserve and to lead
> a
> > > meaningful and good existence in the world.
> > >
> > > I really believe the future of humanity will benefit from this and
> > > individuals
> > > will develop into more decent and moral and loving and caring beings.
> > >
> > > I fail to see the recognition of the uncertainty and gushing sense of
> lose
> > > and
> > > panic and angst in what you are saying. Haw do you account for them?
> > >
> > > Alon
> > >
> > >
> > > Quoting Karl Rogers :
> > >
> > > > Alon,
> > > > Thank you for the congratulations.
> > > > Yes it is a monograph -- most academic books are -- and, I guess, that
> > the
> > > > paperback version will appear once the first edition hardback has been
> > > soold.
> > > > I also think that it is expensive, so, unless you are feeling
> > particularly
> > > > rich, I suggest, if you feel so inclined, that you request that the
> > library
> > > > buys a copy.
> > > > This book is primarily critically concerned with the idea that
> > experimental
> > > > physics provides us with knowledge of the natural world. However, it is
> > not
> > > a
> > > > work about the epistemology of science. It is in fact an effort to
> clear
> > > away
> > > > ontological preconceptions about who we are and our place in the world,
> > by
> > > > showing how experimental physics is founded upon those preconceptions.
> It
> > > is
> > > > in fact a preface to an deeper existential relation to the world, for
> > those
> > > > of us who have inherited positivistic conceptions of Man and Nature,
> and,
> > > in
> > > > my own way, an effort to help free us from that inheritance by
> > questioning
> > > > whether those conceptions are, in fact, based upon empirical facts or
> > > > metaphysical precepts.
> > > > How does this book relate to your work? Well, as you know from our
> > previous
> > > > conversations, my academics interests are in the relationships between
> > > > rationality, freedom, and happiness. For me, philosophy is a lived and
> > > > personal intellectual pursuit that is primarily directed to discover
> the
> > > > extent that one can have a rational understanding of how to live a free
> > and
> > > > happy life. It is quite obvious that, in this respect, the "academic"
> > > > divisions between ethics, aesthetics, and analytics are not only
> > arbitrary,
> > > > but also unhelpful. Given that we are social beings, our own
> > philosophical
> > > > interpretations of meaning and purpose are achieved through social
> > > > dialectics, historically mediated by inherited narratives, then it is
> > quite
> > > > impossible to avoid using preconceptions and assumptions in order to
> > > > communicate to others in public or ourselves in private. However, even
> if
> > > we
> > > > cannot avoid using preconceptions and assumptions, we still need to
> > > > critically reflect upon the impact of preconceptions
> > > > and assumptions upon how we understand ourselves and the world in which
> > we
> > > > exist. I am concentrating my efforts on raising a critical awareness of
> > the
> > > > biases of the so-called "natural sciences" because it is my belief
> that,
> > > for
> > > > many people in the modern world, their understanding of "self" and
> > "world"
> > > > presupposes a certain degree of "false consciousness" and arrogance
> > > regarding
> > > > their own objectivity, knowledge, and methodologies. Once we have
> > > highlighted
> > > > and critically examined this "false consciousness" then we can see how
> > > > ethnographical and phenomenological work, such as living action
> research,
> > > is
> > > > no more, nor less "scientific" than the so-called postivistic sciences
> > > > (including both "natural" and "social" sciences). This awareness not
> only
> > > > permits us to defend our right to "unmethodological" inquiry against
> > those
> > > > that make claim to the neccessity of "positivistic methodology", but,
> > > > perhaps, due to the richness, complexity, and subtety of reflective
> > > narrative
> > > > (autobiographical or
> > > > otherwise) over numerical data, we have a case for claiming a greater
> > > degree
> > > > of rigor. It is for this reason that I consider my book as being a
> > preface
> > > to
> > > > narrative based research, such as living action research, in so far as
> it
> > > > aims to help clear a free space, so to speak, for such narratives to be
> > > free
> > > > of positivistic restrictions and demands.
> > > > Anyway, the first chapter is free on Palgrave Macmillan's webpage, so
> > read
> > > it
> > > > and judge for yourself whether it is interesting to you. After all, you
> > > might
> > > > think that £45 is a bargain for such wisdom.
> > > > love, Karl.
> > > >
> > > > A Serper
> > > wrote:
> > > > Congratulations, Karl on the new book
> > > >
> > > > This is one of the most expensive book I have encountered. Why is that?
> > Is
> > > > there a softcover too?
> > > >
> > > > I, myself, am currently working on a monograph on the possibility to
> > > > accommodate
> > > > human existence and the conception of the human subject through
> > > individuals'
> > > > engaging dialectically with the question how do I lead a more
> meaningful
> > > > existence in and with the world for myself?, through constructing,
> > > conveying
> > > > and sharing a personal systematic, phenomenological analysis of
> > ontological
> > > > principles - ontological security, dignity, well-being, integrity,
> > respect
> > > > from
> > > > others and self-respect - which are shared by all human subjects in
> > common
> > > in
> > > > light of this engagement with that question. I hope this will be
> accepted
> > > as
> > > > the leading heuristic tool for the conception of human existence.
> > > >
> > > > As you can see, our extensive conversations from December, 2003, really
> > > > helped,
> > > > which is why I am saying it here to you.
> > > >
> > > > Are there any overlaps with your book? Is it a monograph as well?
> > > >
> > > > Alon
> > > >
> > > > Quoting Karl Rogers :
> > > >
> > > > > Hi folks,
> > > > > Please excuse the obvious "plug", but I thought that some of you
> might
> > be
> > > > > interested to know that my book (presenting a critical analysis of
> > > > scientific
> > > > > knowledge in the so-called positivistic natural sciences) is being
> > > released
> > > > > next month. Details can be found at
> > > > > http://www.palgrave.com/products/Catalogue.aspx?is=1403945284
> > > > > best regards,
> > > > > Karl.
> > > > >
> > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends
> > > http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > > > Send instant messages to your online friends
> > http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
> > >
> > > Send instant messages to your online friends
> http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
> >
> > Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>
>
> Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
January 2024
November 2023
May 2023
March 2023
January 2023
March 2022
December 2021
November 2021
May 2020
March 2020
February 2020
August 2019
December 2015
August 2015
May 2015
April 2015
January 2015
August 2011
March 2011
November 2010
August 2010
October 2009
November 2006
May 2006
July 2005
June 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
November 2004
October 2004
June 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager