Peter et al.,
On 2005 Mar 31 , at 15.40, Norman Gray wrote:
> The Alpha build failed at RAL last night, too, because the test for
> 'f77 -E' passed spuriously (I've no idea what -E does here, since it
> seems not to do `just preprocessing', and it isn't documented). I'm
> fixing that.
>
>> [...]
> Right, I'll see if I can sanely add '$FC -old_f77' to the list of
> invocations which are attempted. Failing that, it can go in the
> per-platform build notes.
>
>> [...]
>> fort: Error: conftest.f, line 24: Unknown keyword value
>> : STATUS = 'REPLACE',
>>
>> so that's not surprising. There is no 'REPLACE' status in F77 (just
>> 'OLD',
>> 'NEW', 'UNKNOWN' and 'SCRATCH'), so you'll need to re-work that test.
Fixed. This now appears to work on Tru64 and OS X (weirdo compiler and
weirdo filesystem, so probably a decent pair of tests...). However I
can't check the '-old_f77' thing on rlsaxp0 -- if you feel like it, can
you update autoconf and give this another go, Peter, when you have a
chance?
Let's see what happens tonight.
Norman
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Norman Gray : Physics & Astronomy, Glasgow University, UK
http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/ : www.starlink.ac.uk
|