On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 14:27 +0000, Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Firstly I should say the designers of SKOS Core have considered
> interoperability with DQC-RDF a major design goal from the very
> beginning. I'm really glad we're having this discussion, as it gives
> us a chance to evaluate whether we can reasonably achieve that goal,
> with the SKOS Core Guide and Vocabulary Specification documents about
> to go to first public working draft.
When looking closer at SKOS, it seems that it offers just what is needed
to replace the home-grown Taxonomy class of the LOM RDF binding. If SKOS
reaches recommendation status, I'd certainly consider it for reuse in
LOM. Is there a time plan for SKOS?
That would also bring the LOM RDF binding into full conflict with IMS
VDEX: http://www.imsglobal.org/vdex/
:-) (I don't particularly approve of VDEX)
/Mikael
|