It is interesting that the City of London's Innholders Company sets out its
origins as follows -
"The Worshipful Company of Innholders received its first charter from Henry
V111 in 1514, although inns started to assume their colourful role in
national life during the 13th century in order to serve the growing numbers
of pilgrims and traders when monasteries could no longer meet their needs."
>From: Peter King <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: "From: Local-History list" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: inholder
>Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:34:55 -0000
>
>Whether it is 'federal' or 'feudal', I still do not think the meaning that
>you found is relevant, certainly not to 16th or 17th century Quarter
>Sessions documents on which you appear to be working. I do not recall
>coming across the term 'inholder' even in a medieval context, where feudal
>relationships might be significant.
>
>Peter King
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: From: Local-History list [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
>Behalf Of Hideaki Inui
>Sent: 09 February 2005 10:33
>To: Peter Wickham King
>Subject: Re: inholder
>
>Thanks, Peter.
>
>I found it a big mistake to regard "Federal" as "feudal"...
>
>Hideaki
>
> > I think that is an American meaning, not English.
> >
> > There is no English equivalent of Federal lands. Everything belongs to
>some
> > one. Even the Crown estate largely results from what was once the
>private
> > property of subjects.
> >
> > Peter King
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: From: Local-History list [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
> > Behalf Of Hideaki Inui
> > Sent: 08 February 2005 09:00
> > To: Peter Wickham King
> > Subject: Re: inholder
> >
> > Sorry...I found the meaning of inholder; those living in/near Federal
> > lands/natl forests/parks/refuges
> >
> > Hideaki
> >
>
>--
>[log in to unmask]
|