Peter
If it's easier for you to just buy some MS s/w that you need then go
ahead if the alternative is to chase around for it.
..David
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Starlink development [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of
> Peter W. Draper
> Sent: 31 January 2005 13:20
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Starlink Nightly Build On System: SPARC-SOL9
>
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Mark Taylor wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Peter W. Draper wrote:
> >
> > > looks like your changes to Treeview haven't made it into the
webstart
> > > dependencies, so some of them are still looking for treeview-
> parts.jnlp,
> > > which I guess should now be datanode.jnlp? You want to look at
that or
> > > should I?
> >
> > You're right, I had just about noticed I was planning to get round
to
> > it sometime. However, I'm not sure I ever got the hang of the
> > -PARTS business. Am I right in thinking that since there are now
> > no "backwards" references between packages, this mechanism is no
> > longer necessary anywhere, and every package can just have a single
> > JNLP file?
>
> Yes, thinking about it, that should now be true.
>
> > If you feel the urge to have a go at sorting the JNLP files out,
> > by all means go ahead (probably it needs some changes in SPLAT as
well
> > as my packages, so you'll have to do some stuff in any case). If
you
> > don't though I'll take a look at it in the reasonably near future.
>
> OK, I'll have a look.
>
> I'm completely bogged down on the JNIAST windows DLL problem that's
> holding back SPLAT-VO progress, so I intend to give it a rest for a
while
> and see if I get my hands on some Microsoft development kit we're
> apparently licensed for in the university. It's grasping at straws,
but
> it's all I have without a major insight.
>
> Peter.
|