On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Mark Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Peter W. Draper wrote:
>
> > looks like your changes to Treeview haven't made it into the webstart
> > dependencies, so some of them are still looking for treeview-parts.jnlp,
> > which I guess should now be datanode.jnlp? You want to look at that or
> > should I?
>
> You're right, I had just about noticed I was planning to get round to
> it sometime. However, I'm not sure I ever got the hang of the
> -PARTS business. Am I right in thinking that since there are now
> no "backwards" references between packages, this mechanism is no
> longer necessary anywhere, and every package can just have a single
> JNLP file?
Yes, thinking about it, that should now be true.
> If you feel the urge to have a go at sorting the JNLP files out,
> by all means go ahead (probably it needs some changes in SPLAT as well
> as my packages, so you'll have to do some stuff in any case). If you
> don't though I'll take a look at it in the reasonably near future.
OK, I'll have a look.
I'm completely bogged down on the JNIAST windows DLL problem that's
holding back SPLAT-VO progress, so I intend to give it a rest for a while
and see if I get my hands on some Microsoft development kit we're
apparently licensed for in the university. It's grasping at straws, but
it's all I have without a major insight.
Peter.
|