On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Peter W. Draper wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Rankin, SE (Stephen) wrote:
>
> > I did that yesterday too, the Mac and Solaris builds should have worked
> > when they come in later today; assuming nothing else is wrong.
>
> Good, if the OS X starjava build started after my last commit we should be
> in business.
>
> > They should also have web start links on the starjava module build
> > pages.
>
> I'd spotted those, but it seems most of the webstart applications are
> broken (only one I could get up and running was FROG).
>
> Mark,
>
> looks like your changes to Treeview haven't made it into the webstart
> dependencies, so some of them are still looking for treeview-parts.jnlp,
> which I guess should now be datanode.jnlp? You want to look at that or
> should I?
You're right, I had just about noticed I was planning to get round to
it sometime. However, I'm not sure I ever got the hang of the
-PARTS business. Am I right in thinking that since there are now
no "backwards" references between packages, this mechanism is no
longer necessary anywhere, and every package can just have a single
JNLP file?
If you feel the urge to have a go at sorting the JNLP files out,
by all means go ahead (probably it needs some changes in SPLAT as well
as my packages, so you'll have to do some stuff in any case). If you
don't though I'll take a look at it in the reasonably near future.
Mark
--
Mark Taylor Starlink Programmer Physics, Bristol University, UK
[log in to unmask] +44-117-928-8776 http://www.star.bris.ac.uk/~mbt/
|