JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DC-ARCHITECTURE Archives


DC-ARCHITECTURE Archives

DC-ARCHITECTURE Archives


DC-ARCHITECTURE@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DC-ARCHITECTURE Home

DC-ARCHITECTURE Home

DC-ARCHITECTURE  January 2005

DC-ARCHITECTURE January 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

"Latest versions" for XML Schemas

From:

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

DCMI Architecture Group <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:50:35 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (221 lines)

Before DC-2004, I posted a summary of several problems/issues with the
DC XML Schemas

http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/xmls-issues/

And these were discussed in the WG meeting at DC-2004. See Andy's report
at

http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind0410&L=dc-architecture&
T=0&F=&S=&P=4565

This message makes a proposal to address the first (and _only_ the
first) of those issues. i.e. the provision of a set of URIrefs which
support the referencing of a "current version" of each schema (and
changes to the inter-schema referencing necessary to support that).

Apologies for the length and complexity of this message but I think it
is important that I try to explain the background and the options
available.

Current Position
================

The current position is that

http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/

points to

[1] http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2003/04/02/dc.xsd
[2] http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2003/04/02/dcterms.xsd
[3] http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2003/04/02/dcmitype.xsd

[4] http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2003/04/02/simpledc.xsd
[5 http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2003/04/02/qualifieddc.xsd

[1] contains a reference to the W3C xml.xsd schema, using an absolute
URI reference
[2] contains references to [1] and [3], using relative URI references
(same directory)
[3] contains no external references

[4] contains a reference to [1], using a relative URI reference (same
directory)
[5] contains a reference to [2], using a relative URI reference (same
directory)

[1], [2] and [3] are certainly referenced by implementer schemas so
these URIs _must_ continue to dereference to these schemas.
[4] and [5] are probably referenced by implementer schemas so these URIs
_must_ continue to dereference to these schemas.

The following more recent versions exist - they were never announced or
linked to from http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/ but some implementers
found them

[6] http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2004/06/14/dcterms.xsd
(as [2], but amended to include XML elements for the license and
rightsHolder properties)
[7] http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2004/06/14/dcmitype.xsd
(as [3] but amended to include enumerated values for the MovingImage and
StillImage classes)

[6] contains a reference to "dc.xsd" and to [7], using relative URI
references (same directory)
[7] contains no external references.

As dc.xsd doesn't exist in this directory, it seems to me that [6] is
essentially unusable, and I'm inclined to say we should delete it.

[7] contains no external references so is usable, and although it was
never announced, some implementers found it, and it may be referenced by
implemeter schemas so that URI _must_ continue to dereference to that
schema.

Note: there have been no DCMI-supplied XML schemas issued to provide an
XML element reflecting the approval of the dcterms:provenance property.


Proposal 1(a): Issuing New Versions
====================================

I suggest we now create

[8] http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2005/01/25/dcterms.xsd
(as [2], but amended to
(a) include XML elements for the license, rightsHolder, & provenance
properties; and
(b) contain references to [1] and [7] using relative URIs giving
absolute paths (/schemas/xmls/qdc/2003/04/02/dc.xsd and
/schemas/xmls/qdc/2004/06/14/dcmitype.xsd) (so that the references will
resolve on the mirror sites)

A schema corresponding to [8] is currently available at

http://homes.ukoln.ac.uk/~lispj/dc-xmls/schemas/xmls/qdc/2005/01/25a/dct
erms.xsd

(N.B. That is not usable because the relative URIs don't resolve from
that location.)

This approach suggests that we create new versions of a schema when the
content of that schema changes, and also when it is necessary to update
references to specific date-stamped versions of the other schemas. i.e.

- any change to dc.xsd results in
  - a new date-stamped dc.xsd
  - a new date-stamped dcterms.xsd referencing the new dc.xsd
  - (see also below re latest versions)

- any change to dcterms.xsd results in
  - a new date-stamped dcterms.xsd
  - (see also below re latest versions)

- any change to dcmitype.xsd results in
  - a new date-stamped dcmitype.xsd
  - a new date-stamped dcterms.xsd referencing the new dcmitype.xsd
  - (see also below re latest versions)

The advantage of 1(a) over 1(b) is that there are redundant versions of
schemas are not created; the disadvantage is that it requires careful
management of the inter-schema references.

Proposal 1(b): Issuing New Versions
====================================

An alternative to the above would be to create new versions of all three
schemas each time any one of the three is changed i.e. we now create

[9] http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2005/01/25/dc.xsd (as [1])
[10] http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2005/01/25/dcterms.xsd
(as [2], but amended to include XML elements for the license,
rightsHolder, & provenance properties)
[11] http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2005/01/25/dcmitype.xsd (as
[7])

[10] contains references to [9] and [11], using relative URI references
(same directory)

Schemas corresponding to [9], [10], [11] are currently available at

http://homes.ukoln.ac.uk/~lispj/dc-xmls/schemas/xmls/qdc/2005/01/25b/dc.
xsd
http://homes.ukoln.ac.uk/~lispj/dc-xmls/schemas/xmls/qdc/2005/01/25b/dct
erms.xsd
http://homes.ukoln.ac.uk/~lispj/dc-xmls/schemas/xmls/qdc/2005/01/25b/dcm
itype.xsd

Following this approach

- any change to dc.xsd results in
  - a new date-stamped dc.xsd
  - a new date-stamped dcterms.xsd
  - a new date-stamped dcmitype.xsd
  - (see also below re latest versions)

- any change to dcterms.xsd results in
  - a new date-stamped dcterms.xsd
  - a new date-stamped dc.xsd
  - a new date-stamped dcmitype.xsd
  - (see also below re latest versions)

- any change to dcmitype.xsd results in
  - a new date-stamped dcmitype.xsd
  - a new date-stamped dcterms.xsd
  - a new date-stamped dc.xsd
  - (see also below re latest versions)

The advantage of 1(b) over 1(a) is that it is less complex to manage the
inter-schema references: dcterms.xsd always uses same directory relative
URI references; the disadvantage is that there are redundant
versions/copies of schemas.


Proposal Two: Access to Latest Versions
=======================================
I suggest we also introduce three new "non-date-stamped" URI references

[12] http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/dc.xsd
[13] http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/dcterms.xsd
[14] http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/dcmitype.xsd

to refer to the latest versions of dc.xsd, dcterms.xsd and dcmitype.xsd.


I _think_ these can simply be redirects to the latest dc.xsd,
dcterms.xsd, and dcmitype.xsd respectively. And those redirects would
require updating when changes were made to those target schemas. (Under
Proposal 1(b), all three redirects would change whenever a change was
made because all three target schemasa are re-issued; under 1(a) a
change to dcterms.xsd only would require a change to only that redirect)



Container Elements
===================
Note that I propose that we do _not_ create new versions of [4] or [5]
or corresponding redirect references, because we agreed in the WG
meeting in Shanghai to develop schemas with XML-namespace-qualified
container elements. I'll post a separate message regarding that,
probably at the start of next week.

But for now I'd like to try to establish

(a) whether what I've proposed here will work, or whether I've missed
something(!)
(b) whether we should adopt 1(a) or 1(b)

(I started off in favour of 1(a) to avoid generating redundant copies,
but I think I'm now in favour of 1(b) to simplify the maintainance of
the cross-references).

Pete
-------
Pete Johnston
Research Officer (Interoperability)
UKOLN, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
tel: +44 (0)1225 383619    fax: +44 (0)1225 386838
mailto:[log in to unmask]
http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/p.johnston/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

February 2024
January 2024
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
September 2022
August 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager