Hello,
The script used to work for Python 2.2 and 2.3. I tried to improve the
script to make it more user friendly and unfortunately managed to make it
unintentionally hostile to 2.3. I've updated the script again to allow
2.3 (and 2.4) back in (and we are probably moving towards that soon in any
case). If anybody wants a copy let me know and I'll email it to them.
Otherwise, it will be in the next release (which should happen soonish).
Wayne
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Krystyna Bromek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have got round to installing analysis 1.0.1
>
> I have python 2.3, which came with fedoraC2 and was happily working with
> analysis 1.0.b18
>
> When installing analysis and asked if I have python2.2 said "yes" as
> previously, gave the dir "/usr", but script would not accept it for an
> answer. It insisted that I have to have /usr/python2.2/include;
>
> "Could not find required files ('include/python2.2', 'lib/python2.2') in
> /usr "
>
> when cheeted to have python2.2 dir it produced this:
>
> "Where is the Python dir? /usr
> Guess Python version = 2.3 (by looking), is this ok (y or n) (reply y
> unless sure otherwise)? y"
>
> After that I have removed the cheat and changed the entry in the
> ccpnmr1.0/c/environment.txt from 2.2 to 2.3 and analysis compiled fine.
>
> Is the 2.2 demand a deliberate feature (ie 2.3 is not suitable) and I'm
> going to find that things will not work ?
> Or should the script just look if one has pythonX.X/lib pythonX.X/include
> and as long as it is >= 2.2 be happy ?
>
>
> Cheers
> Krys
>
> --
> Dr. Krystyna Bromek
> === Biomolecular NMR ====
> University of Glasgow, IBLS
> Joseph Black Building B4-17,
> Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
> Tel: 0141 330 6459
>
|