Hi Darren,
At 20:03 15/11/2005, you wrote:
>Klaas:
>
>Just wanted to point out the slight inconsistency in your response.
>I sent this just to you, but if you want then post it to others.
>
>I asked
>
>>>Do you mean afferent connection TO the driving region, or efferent
>>>connections FROM the driving region or both?
>
>You answered:
>
>>The latter.
>
>So, by this I assume you mean BOTH. In any case, the paper by Karl
>describes inputs as photic (all stimuli) into V1, then motion
>(portion of all stimuli) as modulating V1 to V5, so he is modulating
>the efferent connection from V1 to V5.
My apologies - I did not spot the "both" at the end. I meant
"efferent connections FROM the driving region"
Sorry for the confusion - all the best
Klaas
|