OK so at least it is reproducible. Maybe John could comment on the
reason for this choice of behaviour of the program, or change it in a
later version.
Best
Torben
Torben E. Lund
Danish Research Centre for MR
Copenhagen University Hospital
Kettegaard Allé 30
2650 Hvidovre
Denmark
email: [log in to unmask]
webpage: http://www.drcmr.dk
On 1 Feb 2005, at 11:33, Christian Keysers wrote:
> Thank you ! That was indeed the trouble!
>
> Christian
>
>
> Torben Ellegaard Lund wrote:
>
> This can happen when the functional images does only have partial
> coverage. Have you tried to write the normalised structural only?
>
> best
> Torben
>
>
> Torben E. Lund
> Danish Research Centre for MR
> Copenhagen University Hospital
> Kettegaard Allé 30
> 2650 Hvidovre
> Denmark
> email: [log in to unmask]
> webpage: http://www.drcmr.dk
>
> On 1 Feb 2005, at 11:14, Christian Keysers wrote:
>
>
> Dear SPMers
>
> I have followed John Ashburner's proceedure for aligning data from
> different days, and it works very nicely
> After determining the normalisation based on the segmented T1 and the
> apriory for grey matter, we applied this normalisation using the
> template bounding box to our mean functional and T1, and found the top
> of the parietal lobe and the bottom of the cerebellum to be chopped
> off...
>
> I checked the segmentation, and it contains everything. I visualised
> the
> normalised T1 many ways. The top and bottom are always missing...
>
> What are we doing wrong?
>
>
> --
> Christian Keysers, PhD
> Assistant Professor
>
> BCN Neuro-Imaging Center
> University of Groningen
> Antonius Deusinglaan 2 (room 120)
> 9713 AW Groningen
>
> Phone: +31 50 3638794
> Fax: +31 50 3638875
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Christian Keysers, PhD
> Assistant Professor
>
> BCN Neuro-Imaging Center
> University of Groningen
> Antonius Deusinglaan 2 (room 120)
> 9713 AW Groningen
>
> Phone: +31 50 3638794
> Fax: +31 50 3638875
>
>
|