Yes that's exactly what I want to do its only for visualising.
However, when I applied the *sn.mat transformations to the con*
images (i think that's what MSU uses) it didn't change anything ?!!
so then I applied the transforms to all the images in the results
folder (just in case ;)) and then I got nonsense. I'll try it again
and see if I have more luck. I may have inadvertantly selected a
wrong file somewhere.
Thanks
Anna
On Sep 9, 2005, at 12:21 PM, Claus Lamm wrote:
> Dear Anna
>
> I am not a SPM-superuser, but this certainly isn't the standard way to
> analyse neuroanatomy data with SPM
> -> there might be inherent problems associated on which others
> might want to
> comment upon.
>
> Technically, you can simply use the normalization parameters for your
> subjects
> SPM99: *_sn3d.mat
> SPM2: the *_sn.mat
>
> select: normalization -> write normalized only -> select parameters ->
> select your statistical
> images.
>
> Be careful though: normalisation will also affect the smoothness of
> your
> maps (yielding 2x2x2 maps)
> - though this shouldn't be a big problem if you only use
> normalization to
> localize/visualize your results.
>
>
> Best
> Claus
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: SPM (Statistical Parametric Mapping)
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> Behalf Of Anna Barnes
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 4:57 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [SPM] can I spatially normalise results files
>
>
> Is there a way to get the SPM(t) maps into standard anatomical
> space after
> doing the analysis in the subjects space so that I can use the MSU
> utility
> other than going back to the original images and reprocessing them and
> running the stats analysis again.
>
> Thanks
> anna
>
>
>
> Anna Barnes, PhD
>
> fMRI Research Laboratory
>
> Department of Radiology
>
> Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
>
> 710 W168th St
>
> New York, NY10032
>
> USA
>
> +1212 342 0293
>
|