Dear SPMers,
When I estimate a SPM in workspace with SPM2 from the command line or batch
using
SPM = spm_spm(SPM);
the results are slightly different from when I use the Estimate button in
the GUI to estimate the same original SPM.mat.
When using ImCalc to compare the con* images of interest of both methods,
there are differences of -.04 to +.08 in the image. The data in the
following variables are also different:
SPM.xX. W. xKXs
pKX
V
Bcov
nKX
SPM.xVi. h. V
Cy (not CY)
SPM.xVol. FWHM. R
SPM.VResMS. pinfo (though they seem the same?)
Who can help me?
Kind regards,
Guido van Wingen
FC Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging
Radboud University Nijmegen
The Netherlands
[log in to unmask]
|