JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SPM Archives


SPM Archives

SPM Archives


SPM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SPM Home

SPM Home

SPM  2005

SPM 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Bug in PPI?

From:

Darren Gitelman <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Darren Gitelman <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:22:27 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (119 lines)

Dear Mike, Jan and SPM

I tried this out and you are clearly right. SPM  (i.e., spm_regions) 
includes the zero columns from non-modeled sessions in X0. I think this is 
incorrect. The two ways I thought of to deal with this would be

  1) use pinv instead of inv whenever something like this might come up 
with the null space matrix. I don't know if it would work in all instances.

   2) Another possibility would be to fix spm_regions. My suggestion is the 
code below. However, it should be verified that doing this to X0 is legitimate.

I don't know which of the above is the "better" overall solution. The 
actual answers differ very little from each other using the two methods. 
The cumulative absolute difference in Yc (line 204 of spm_peb_ppi) using a 
simulated design was around 4 x 10^-16.  This is probably within rounding 
error.
------------------------------------------------
This code will remove all zero columns from a matrix. It could be placed, 
for example, as an internal function in spm_regions and then called after 
line 206 as xY.X0 = removezerocols(xY.X0);

I couldn't think of a way to vectorize this, but since the find function is 
speedy and the matrix is shrinking it shouldn't take much time to perform. 
I tried it on a matrix of 1x10^6 rows and 8 columns (probably bigger than 
any X0). The matrix had 3 all zero columns and the code only took 1.2 
seconds. The time is similar if you had a 10,000 row x 100 column X0 with 
50% zero columns. With a more usual size X0 the code takes 0.01 seconds.

%=================
function m = removezerocols(m)
% REMOVEZEROCOLS - removes columns of all zeros from a matrix.
%
for i = size(m,2):-1:1
     if isempty(find(m(:,i)))
         m(:,i) = [];
     end
end
return

----Darren

At 06:57 AM 6/17/2005, Jan Gläscher wrote:
>Dear Darren and others,
>
>I came across a peculiarity in the combination of data extraction via
>the VOI button and subsequently setting up a PPI.
>
>Here the basic design specs:
>- single subject analysis with 3 sessions
>- extract data with VOI button for one session (e.g. 1st session) with
>   adjustment for effects of interest (null space X0 comprises only the
>   session constants)
>- PPI setup: (1) 'psychophysiological interaction'
>                         (2) include only one regressor (modelling a block of
>                              pain stimulation)
>                         (3) weight for this regressor: 
> 1
>
>
>The warning mesage that I get when setting up the PPI is the following:
>
> >> Warning: Matrix is singular to working precision.
>(Type "warning off MATLAB:singularMatrix" to suppress this warning.)
> > In /apps/public/spm02/spm_peb_ppi.m at line 204
>
>
>Looking at line 204 in spm_peb_ppi.m,
>
>Yc    = Y - X0*inv(X0'*X0)*X0'*Y;
>
>I realize that the warning can be traced to the null space X0, because
>the inverse of X0 is not defined.  Consequently, PPI.Y is a vector of
>NaN's.
>
>X0 is created by spm_regions.m when I press the VOI-button and
>comprises in my situation the session-specific block partition of the
>design matrix (xX.iB) and high-pass filter (xX.K).  Thus, in the
>3 session case the first part of X0 has three column, the first with
>1's and the second and third with 0's.  Because these are perfectly
>collinear the inverse of X0'*X0 in line 204 is not defined.
>
>Here are my questions:
>(1) Am I doing something wrong when I adjust for the effects of
>         interest when I extract the data with spm_regions?
>
>(2) Is this a problem at all for the PPI computations?
>
>(3) Conceptually speaking, shouldn't the null space X0 only comprise
>         the "real" session constant (the column of 1's) and not the entire
>         block partition of the design matrix (i.e., leave out the columns
>         of 0's)? This would allieviate the problem with perfect
>         collinearity of some of the columns in X0.
>
>Thank you for your comments in input.
>Jan
>
>--
>Jan Gläscher                  NeuroImage Nord
>+49-40-42803-7890 (office)    Dept. of  Systems Neuroscience, Bldg S10
>+49-40-42803-9955 (fax)       University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
>[log in to unmask]  Martinistr. 52
>                               20246 Hamburg
>                               Germany
>http://www.uke.uni-hamburg.de/kliniken/neurologie/index_16969.php
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>GnuPG/PGP key id: FEC4B55C
>fingerprint: 5A36 1EF6 8472 117E 805A  F240 3146 A410 FEC4 B55C
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Darren R. Gitelman, M.D.
Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer¹s Disease Center
Northwestern Univ., 320 E. Superior St., Searle 11-470, Chicago, IL 60611
Voice:   (312) 908-9023     Fax:  (312) 908-8789
------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager