Hi,
> > I know this is going to seem very tedious to everyone, but the
> > thresholded map does not address my assertion 1, and therefore doesn't
> > address localization. I feel this is a major point, as most of us
> > believe that localization is the main advantage of brain imaging. To
> > check - do you disagree with this? If so, why?
Sorry, I think I must have misplaced my question here: how about:
> > I know this is going to seem very tedious to everyone, but the
> > thresholded map does not address my assertion 1, and therefore doesn't
> > address localization. To
> > check - do you disagree with this? If so, why?
As to the anxiety about overinterpretation of unthresholded maps, I'm
not sure there is much else to say. I refer to you Tom Nichols email
in this thread, or to almost any behavioural paper, where
not-signficant effects are routinely and appropriately reported.
Best,
Matthew
|