Hi,
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:57:46 -0800, Rosen, Howie <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Many of the recent emails regarding the limitations of the
> stationariness assumption for SVC in VBM made specific reference to
> SPM99. Does SPM2 use a local estimate of resels per voxel estimate when
> calculating small volume correction? I.e. is the SVC procedure in SPM2
> "safe" for VBM?
As far as I can see (using 'grep RPV *.m in the SPM directory) SPM2
does not use the RPV image.
Best,
Matthew
|