He was obviously deleuzanal, but I guess people will have forgotten that he
was bald
P
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Poetryetc provides a venue for a dialogue relating to
> poetry and poetics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> Behalf Of Dominic Fox
> Sent: 08 December 2005 15:03
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Fw: Pinter on Blair
>
> Ah, the Millennium Dome...
>
> In a similar spirit to Foucault's pronouncement that one day
> our century would be known as Deleuzian, I once suggested
> that the real Millennium Dome was baldy Foucault's "hard-nut pate"...
>
> I imagine that people will still know who Foucault was long
> after they've forgotten what the Millennium Dome was.
>
> Dominic
>
> On 12/8/05, Peter Cudmore <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Gah.
> >
> > On the reasoning that personal legacy = size of price tag, we have:
> >
> > 1st term Blair -- Millennium Dome
> > 2nd term Blair -- Iraq
> > 3rd term Blair -- trying to revive the nuclear industry at public
> > expense
> >
> > If we could just finish paying (both financially and
> environmentally)
> > for the first time round before making a new commitment.
> >
> > On Pinter, I do think he does his oevre a disservice by
> ranting away
> > like a grump at a wedding.
> >
> > P
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Poetryetc provides a venue for a dialogue relating
> to poetry
> > > and poetics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
> Of Dominic
> > > Fox
> > > Sent: 08 December 2005 14:43
> > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > Subject: Re: Fw: Pinter on Blair
> > >
> > > I don't think a lot of pressure was required. Blair seems
> honestly
> > > to have believed in what he was doing. Which may be even more
> > > worrying, depending on your point of view.
> > >
> > > Dominic
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Shall we be pure or impure? Today
> we shall be very pure. It must always
> be possible to contain
> impurities in a pure way.
> --Tarmo Uustalu and Varmo Vene
>
|