Thanks, SB, I understand completely what you're saying. But, tho it may not
be apparent to anyone WHY, my messages to Patrick are not intended to be
private. There's much more than meets the eye in these messages of ours. I
know some of the "much more," and I leave it to anyone who wants to figure
that out to do so. Those that do not want to figure it out are still,
always, free to read p'raps the first couple lines (if they don't wanna miss
my Awesome Poems), and then press "Delete." Sound like a plan? I think so.
I really think so. I do all of my writing with a purpose, a
necessary-to-others purpose, believe me.
Blessings,
Judy
----- Original Message -----
From: "SB" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 3:25 PM
Subject: Re: me, May B
judy, i most sadly, and grumpily, agree with deborah on this. it is
this kind of interchange, between you and patrick, that could easily
be done privately, backchannel. this is when i feel gooseberryish.
voyeuristic.
please, do not so quickly dismiss these requests as rude, or selfish,
or controlling. they are, simply, requests for courtesy to the rest of
us.
i don't want to delete your messages -- some of them are about poems,
or poetry -- or are poems -- that i want to read.
i ask, simply, that you conduct your private conversations, in private.
On 8/21/05, judy prince <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Mr. McManus,
>
> You have made me feel so much better. I quit trembling when I read your
--
~ SB =^..^=
http://www.sbpoet.com
http://sb.chatango.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sbmontana/
|