Do you endorse it or not?
Despite the list of qualifications that you seem we wish to read and consider carefully as if your position on this were THE QUESTION OF THE DAY, you seem obsessed by Galloway
If you want to tell us what you think, please say it.
For all his self-regard, Galloway would. I can't imagine him turning his opinion into a course of study and inference
L
-----Original Message-----
From: Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Monday, May 23, 2005 9:47 AM
Subject: Galloway Hatchet Job No. 1
Mr Hitchens takes up the aforementioned implement, and gives it a good
couple of swings:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=5641&R=C5592CD38
I should qualify what may be taken to be my implicit endorsement of
this with the following caveats:
i) Hitchens is a twit.
ii) McCarthyite slander is still McCarthyite slander even if the
victim is someone one finds repellent.
iii) My enjoyment of Galloway's performance remains undiminished, for
the reasons previously stated (once again: you can't stick it to
Rumsfeld too hard or too often for my liking).
I can't concur with Hitchens in getting worked up about Galloway's
having "spat full in the face of the Senate". I only wish he had been
spitting from above.
Dominic
|