I'm not sure whether to laugh or cry. Wasn't he the one who used to
boast that he had no scientific background at all? Umm. It may have
been an English disciple of his.
Roger.
On 11/10/05, Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Progenitor of "science studies" looks aghast at the right's
> co-optation of "postmodern" skepticism (e.g. wrt climate change,
> evolution...):
>
> http://www.ensmp.fr/~latour/articles/article/089.html
>
> Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. (Write it a hundred times).
>
> Dominic
>
> --
> Shall we be pure or impure? Today
> we shall be very pure. It must always
> be possible to contain
> impurities in a pure way.
> --Tarmo Uustalu and Varmo Vene
>
--
http://www.badstep.net/
http://www.cb1poetry.org.uk/
|