It's cetainly spent in a physically expressed sense / in the sense of
depleted - or in this case not
rather than financial, yes
and therefore including that
i prefer to say that than _yes, that is sexual_ but yes
ive been posting this material - nearly wrote "stuff" - to wryting in
different forms trying to find out what it is
and i clicked on poetryetc instead of wryting
but on wryting a year or two ago they had this format of poem in abundance -
a whole set which i have self-published with writers forum (that worries me,
but my wf colleague was content and no one else seemed to want it
i was trying to get around it - the form(at) but have decided to use that
format and try
for variations within it... sort of...not quite sure
[i was posting incoherent - apparently incoherent - texts without
response... interestingly since i reposted in a form / format i have used
before i began to get b-c encouragement...
thanks for the interest
L
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Burke" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: RIDDLED WITH STUFF
> Two:
>
> Moving in a definition, riddled with stuff we should have spent.
>
>
> Is this 'spent' in a sexual sense, Lawrence? I ask seriously for the
> subtext. 'riddled with stuff' is then a more dynamic statement.
>
>
> Andrew
>
|