> >I ought to *try* to be pro, just for novelty's sake.
> >I think Feyerabend as provocateur got in some good jabs at the pieties
> >of scientism, and the "method" against which he wrote was not simply a
> >straw man: there are philosophies of science that are simply
> >unrealistic in both their accounts and their expectations of
> >scientific practice.
> >His autobiography is a really fun read.
> >Some really smart people were influenced by him in good ways.
On 10 May 2005 at 18:13, Mark Weiss wrote:
> That clarifies it all.
With a pro- like that what need for a con-?
M
|