JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH Archives

OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH  2005

OCC-HEALTH 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: sickness absence issue

From:

Clare Haddow <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Occupational Health mailing list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:48:00 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (301 lines)

Hi Jill and list

The way I communicate with the employee's GP is that I obtain the employee's
written consent, and enclose a copy with the letter, and in cases that I feel
need the GP support, I put in the letter that I will contact them once they
have received my letter (and consent form) then there is not a problem with
confidentiality. I also for those cases where I think it makes sense to chat
with the GP  say to the employee that it would be a good idea that I 
speak with
their GP once they have the consent through the post. More often than not the
employee is seeing their GP and asks have they received the letter etc.

Interesting to know what others do, and what is considered best practice?

On the whole I have found GP's to be very helpful and supportive of OH 
assisting
them in trying to get their employee back to work etc.

Kind regards

Clare Haddow
Clare Haddow Occupational Health Specialists


Quoting "SURGERY, GBR-Sutton" <[log in to unmask]>:

> Thank you for your many replies.  Our Occupational Physician did indeed
> write to the GP of the man concerned explaining the work situation etc,
> however the GP wrote back saying that he thought it was advisable for him to
> stay off work until he had seen the consultant. I note that some of you have
> mentioned speaking directly to the GP and I wondered how that went down with
> them as I would have thought that there was an issue with confidentiality
> here.
>
> Jill Rossiter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hawkes, Lynda [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 13 June 2005 08:38
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: sickness absence issue
>
>
> Our OHP writes to the GP to inform him/her what the work situation is and
> what he is recommending in the way of rehab programmes and then we advise HR
> of the recommendations for return to work.  So far we have not had any
> refusals.  We did have an employee who was not happy with our recommendation
> and he went back to his GP, but the GP said that if the OHP said he was fit
> to return then he should return (the employee even told us this!)
> If the employee did still refuse to return then I would advise HR that it
> has become a disciplinary case.
>
> Lynda
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ingham, Jane [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 10:13 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: sickness absence issue
>
>
> I have been following this discussion thread with interest, which I
> initially thought was theoretical.  However, I now have a case which makes
> my interest more practical.
>
> How has this worked for you in practice?  Have any of you got any stock
> phrases that you use in reports where you are in effect overruling a GP?
> Does your report just give advice to HR that you believe that the employee
> should be returning to work and then they issue the order to him/her to
> return? Or do you get more directly involved?  All advice gratefully
> received.
>
> Jane Ingham
> OH Advisor, HMPS
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Swann, Alan B [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 1:17 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: sickness absence issue
>
>
> Peter is correct. However, we have to live with each other. I think before
> handing the problem over to HR/management it would be worth contacting the
> GP to discuss the situation. What are the GP's concerns for his patient and
> can he be re-assured about them. Does he have a realistic view of the
> demands of the job (his patient may have given him a somewhat skewed view)
> This could be an opportunity to build up a positive working relationship
> with a local GP who has perhaps many of Jill's employees on his/her list.
> If the GP is defensive of his original position, it might not work. But no
> harm to anyone in trying
>
> Dr. Alan Swann, BM, AFOM
> Director of Occupational Health
> Occupational Health Service
> Imperial College London
> Southside building
> South Kensington Campus
> London
> SW7 2AZ
> Tel:	+44 (20) 7594 9401
> Fax:	+44 (20) 7594 9407
>  https://www.imperial.ac.uk/spectrum/occhealth
> ***The College OH Service is moving. From July 2005 we will be based on
> Level 4 of the Sherfield Building****
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Judge [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 03 June 2005 10:09 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: sickness absence issue
>
> Jill
>
> Unless your company or their insurers have a specific policy that says only
> a
> GP can sign a person fit to return to the workplace then I would by pass the
> GP
> and inform Human Resources and management that the person is fit to return
> to
> the workplace with whatever recommendations your OHP has suggested. This
> then
> becomes a management/HR issue.
>
> If the policy does say only a GP can return them then ask your OHP to
> discuss
> the situation with the GP and point out how ludicrous it is for a person who
> is
> obviously fit to RTW to be sat on their bums awaiting a "consultant" to
> declare
> them fit. In any case if your OHP is suitably qualified then they are acting
> in
> loco of the consultant. Alternatively get the OHP to contact the consultant
> direct and set out the position and ask the question.
>
> Either way the responsibility for their health and well-being in the
> workplace
> is OH's not the GP's or the consultant's  and unless they have assessed the
> workplace and the risk then they have no valid reason to not agree a return
> to
> the workplace, unless of course the person concerned has specified they do
> not
> wish to return for whatever reason. Again, another issue for HR/management.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Pete Judge
> Cardiff Uni.
>
>
>
>
>>>> [log in to unmask] 06/03/05 8:42 am >>>
> Dear Members
>
> We currently have an employee who has been off sick  (post op) for the past
> 6 months.  He has seen our Occupational Physician for a routine review and
> basically he was assessed to be fit for his normal duties.  However his GP
> is not willing to allow him back to work until he has been reviewed by his
> Consultant which is not until August.   We have had similar problems in the
> past where GPs will not allow return until seen by the Consultant, however
> it could be a matter of months (as in this case) until they can be seen and
> given the OK to return to work.  I am wondering who is supposed to have
> authority here?  In these sorts of cases waiting to see Consultants for the
> green light to return to work can be as mentioned a matter of several months
> and during this time I would say a hell of a lot of Statutory sick pay is
> paid out unnecessaily and this must be a tremendous cost to the government!
>
> What are your views?
>
> Jill Rossiter
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the
> confidential use of the above named recipient. If you are not the intended
> recipient or person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient,
> you have received this communication in error and must not distribute or
> copy it. Please accept the sender's apologies, notify the sender immediately
> by return e-mail and delete this communication. Thank you.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Please remove this footer before replying.
>
> RCN Society of Occupational Health Nursing Conference 29 Nov 2005 to 1 Dec
> 2006:  Call for papers at
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/files/OCC-HEALTH/OH_Conference_2005.pdf
>
> For list archives and documents, go to
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
>
> For jobs in Occupational Health, go to
> http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/OHJobs/
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Please remove this footer before replying.
>
> RCN Society of Occupational Health Nursing Conference 29 Nov 2005 to 1 Dec
> 2006:  Call for papers at
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/files/OCC-HEALTH/OH_Conference_2005.pdf
>
> For list archives and documents, go to
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
>
> For jobs in Occupational Health, go to
> http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/OHJobs/
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Please remove this footer before replying.
>
> RCN Society of Occupational Health Nursing Conference 29 Nov 2005 to 1 Dec
> 2006:  Call for papers at
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/files/OCC-HEALTH/OH_Conference_2005.pdf
>
> For list archives and documents, go to
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
>
> For jobs in Occupational Health, go to
> http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/OHJobs/
>
> PLEASE NOTE: THE ABOVE MESSAGE WAS RECEIVED FROM THE INTERNET.
>
> On entering the GSi, this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> Secure Intranet (GSi) virus scanning service supplied exclusively by Energis
> in partnership with MessageLabs.
>
> Please see http://www.gsi.gov.uk/main/notices/information/gsi-003-2002.pdf
> for further details.
>
> In case of problems, please call your organisational IT helpdesk
>
> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure
> Intranet (GSi) virus scanning service supplied exclusively by Energis in
> partnership with MessageLabs.
>
> On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus-free
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Please remove this footer before replying.
>
> RCN Society of Occupational Health Nursing Conference 29 Nov 2005 to 1 Dec
> 2006:  Call for papers at
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/files/OCC-HEALTH/OH_Conference_2005.pdf
>
> For list archives and documents, go to
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
>
> For jobs in Occupational Health, go to
> http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/OHJobs/
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Please remove this footer before replying.
>
> RCN Society of Occupational Health Nursing Conference 29 Nov 2005 to 1 Dec
> 2006:  Call for papers at
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/files/OCC-HEALTH/OH_Conference_2005.pdf
>
> For list archives and documents, go to
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
>
> For jobs in Occupational Health, go to
> http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/OHJobs/
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the
> confidential use of the above named recipient. If you are not the intended
> recipient or person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient,
> you have received this communication in error and must not distribute or
> copy it. Please accept the sender's apologies, notify the sender immediately
> by return e-mail and delete this communication. Thank you.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Please remove this footer before replying.
>
> RCN Society of Occupational Health Nursing Conference 29 Nov 2005 to 
> 1 Dec 2006:  Call for papers at
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/files/OCC-HEALTH/OH_Conference_2005.pdf
>
> For list archives and documents, go to
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
>
> For jobs in Occupational Health, go to
> http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/OHJobs/
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please remove this footer before replying.

RCN Society of Occupational Health Nursing Conference 29 Nov 2005 to 1 Dec 2006:  Call for papers at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/files/OCC-HEALTH/OH_Conference_2005.pdf

For list archives and documents, go to
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html

For jobs in Occupational Health, go to
http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/OHJobs/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager