One reference to Habermas doesn't seem to me to constitute a subversion of the mailing list into a Marxist philosophy discussion group. One cannot address disaster management without addressing social issues, and therefore reference to social philosophy is not irrelevant. A Marxist or neo-Marxist view is one possible perspective. There are also others. Is there a problem here?
Roger Musson
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Natural hazards and disasters
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Peiser,
> Benny
>
>
> I'm just wondering whether this mailing list is about Marxist
> philosophy or
> about disaster research and effective disaster management?
>
> Benny Peiser
>
*********************************************************************
This e-mail message, and any files transmitted with it, are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. However, the information contained in this e-mail may subsequently be subject to public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and, unless the information is legally exempt from disclosure, the confidentially of this e-mail and your reply cannot be guaranteed. If this message was not intended for you, you have received it in error and any copying, distribution or other use of any part of it is strictly prohibited. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of the British Geological Survey. The security of e-mail communication cannot be guaranteed and the BGS accepts no liability for claims arising as a result of the use of this medium to transmit messages from or to the BGS. http://www.bgs.ac.uk
*********************************************************************
|