In Denmark itīs any womanīs right to give midwife-assisted birth at home.
She cannot be refused, irrespective of whether she has refused the routine
datings or not. Midwives/doctors will probably try to persuade/recommend her
to go to the hospital - and may also "label" her a high-risk. But the woman
has the law on her side.
The recent 20 years I think, the home-birth rate in DK has been 1-2 %.
bw
Else Broberg
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jane sandall" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 5:12 PM
Subject: The price women pay who refuse routine scans?
> Dear listmembers
> Has anyone come across the following practice?
> If a woman refuses a routine dating or anomaly scan, she is labelled high
> risk and 'not allowed' to have a home birth or give birth in a midwife led
> unit birth. I am wondering how common this practice is, and whether there
is
> any evidence to justify it?
>
> bw
> Jane Sandall
>
> Dr Jane Sandall
> Professor of Midwifery and Women's Health
> Midwifery and Women's Health Research Group,
> Health and Social Care Research Division
> King's College, Waterloo Bridge Wing,
> 150 Stamford Street,
> London, SE1 9NH
> Tel: 020 7848 3605
> Fax: 020 7848 3764
> e-mail:[log in to unmask]
> http://www.kcl.ac.uk/nursing/research/women.html
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 12:52 PM
> Subject: [ukmidwifery] Digest Number 3174
>
>
> > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
> > Ever feel sad or cry for no reason at all? Depression. Narrated by Kate
> > Hudson.
> > http://us.click.yahoo.com/CgpDEA/ubOLAA/xGEGAA/rRBslB/TM
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------~->
> >
> > There are 9 messages in this issue.
> >
> > Topics in this digest:
> >
> > 1. Re: human milk donors
> > From: Cerys Byrne <[log in to unmask]>
> > 2. Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> > From: [log in to unmask]
> > 3. Re: Re: Prolonged second stage
> > From: Deborah <[log in to unmask]>
> > 4. Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> > From: Deborah <[log in to unmask]>
> > 5. Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> > From: [log in to unmask]
> > 6. Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> > From: "jane dutton" <[log in to unmask]>
> > 7. Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> > From: "Claire Kennard" <[log in to unmask]>
> > 8. Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> > From: Deborah <[log in to unmask]>
> > 9. Re: male midwife at homebirth
> > From: "Claire Kennard" <[log in to unmask]>
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 08:59:07 +0000
> > From: Cerys Byrne <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: human milk donors
> >
> > That makes sense.
> >
> > Cerys
> >
> >
> > Nico Nelson wrote:
> >> Cerys,
> >>
> >> I suppose the reason is that the milk is desperately needed for little
> >> babies and especially premmies so while the bm from mothers of 6 month
+
> >> babies is still useful it is not useful for those that need the bm the
> >> most.
> >
> >> Sam
> >>
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 05:35:11 EST
> > From: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> >
> > If they can do it then so can the IMA and OMOM! How did they achieve
> > this?
> >
> > Gail
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:55:39 +0000
> > From: Deborah <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: Re: Prolonged second stage
> >
> > Dear Georgina,
> > My recollection of Jean's personal experience is that she states she
> > has a platypelloid pelvis, first stage labour for days, then her baby
> > got himself into the pelvis and came out........ relatively easily I
> > think. Others may have clearer recollection.
> > Debs Purdue
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:01:21 +0000
> > From: Deborah <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> >
> > Dear Midwives of Great Britain,
> >
> > Shall we put a proposal together with the One-to-one campaign, get a
> > business proposal organised, get on the RCOG, Health Government offices
> > in London, everywhere, and start laying out proposals for protocols and
> > guidelines based on evidence, instinct, and intuition to work with
> > women and consumer groups to take over the maternity services from our
> > patriarchal masters????? Yeah-Ha! And set up selling our services,
> > audited etc, back to the health service. Community based, of course.
> >
> > Debs Purdue Ind MW
> > On 18 Nov 2005, at 07:22, eleanor wrote:
> >
> >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4448008.stm
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Isn't this almost full circle?
> >>
> >> IS
> >> Eleanor Peck
> >> Independent Midwife
> >> www.birthathome.co.uk
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> CONFIDENTIALITY
> >> Posts from this list must not be forwarded to other lists or
> >> individuals without the express permission of the author.
> >>
> >> CHANGING YOUR UKMIDWIFERY SETTINGS:
> >>
> >> To change to the Daily Digest, go no-mail (ie read emails only on the
> >> website), to leave the list, and to remove graphics and adverts from
> >> messages, go to 'Edit My Membership' at
> >> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ukmidwifery
> >>
> >> You can also UNSUBSCRIBE by sending a blank email to:
> >> [log in to unmask] and NOT to the usual group
> >> address.
> >> ***********************
> >>
> >>
> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Message: 5
> > Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 06:06:00 EST
> > From: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 18/11/2005 11:03:13 GMT Standard Time,
> > [log in to unmask] writes:
> >
> > Dear Midwives of Great Britain,
> >
> > Shall we put a proposal together with the One-to-one campaign, get a
> > business proposal organised, get on the RCOG, Health Government offices
> > in London, everywhere, and start laying out proposals for protocols and
> > guidelines based on evidence, instinct, and intuition to work with
> > women and consumer groups to take over the maternity services from our
> > patriarchal masters????? Yeah-Ha! And set up selling our services,
> > audited etc, back to the health service. Community based, of course.
> >
> >
> >
> > Computer says yes. YES YES AND YES. How do we do it?
> >
> > Gail
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Message: 6
> > Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:30:10 -0000
> > From: "jane dutton" <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> >
> > Thinking along similar lines myself, it's a great idea and extremely
> > empowering for all us downtrodden NHS midwives trying to make a
difference
> > within a culture of budgets and deficits!
> > Sign me up
> > Jane
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Deborah
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:01 AM
> > Subject: Re: [ukmidwifery] Nurses sell services back to NHS
> >
> >
> > Dear Midwives of Great Britain,
> >
> > Shall we put a proposal together with the One-to-one campaign, get a
> > business proposal organised, get on the RCOG, Health Government offices
> > in London, everywhere, and start laying out proposals for protocols and
> > guidelines based on evidence, instinct, and intuition to work with
> > women and consumer groups to take over the maternity services from our
> > patriarchal masters????? Yeah-Ha! And set up selling our services,
> > audited etc, back to the health service. Community based, of course.
> >
> > Debs Purdue Ind MW
> > On 18 Nov 2005, at 07:22, eleanor wrote:
> >
> > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4448008.stm
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Isn't this almost full circle?
> > >
> > > IS
> > > Eleanor Peck
> > > Independent Midwife
> > > www.birthathome.co.uk
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > CONFIDENTIALITY
> > > Posts from this list must not be forwarded to other lists or
> > > individuals without the express permission of the author.
> > >
> > > CHANGING YOUR UKMIDWIFERY SETTINGS:
> > >
> > > To change to the Daily Digest, go no-mail (ie read emails only on the
> > > website), to leave the list, and to remove graphics and adverts from
> > > messages, go to 'Edit My Membership' at
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ukmidwifery
> > >
> > > You can also UNSUBSCRIBE by sending a blank email to:
> > > [log in to unmask] and NOT to the usual group
> > > address.
> > > ***********************
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY
> > Posts from this list must not be forwarded to other lists or
individuals
> > without the express permission of the author.
> >
> > CHANGING YOUR UKMIDWIFERY SETTINGS:
> >
> > To change to the Daily Digest, go no-mail (ie read emails only on the
> > website), to leave the list, and to remove graphics and adverts from
> > messages, go to 'Edit My Membership' at
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ukmidwifery
> >
> > You can also UNSUBSCRIBE by sending a blank email to:
> > [log in to unmask] and NOT to the usual group
> > address.
> > ***********************
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> > a.. Visit your group "ukmidwifery" on the web.
> >
> > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > [log in to unmask]
> >
> > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service.
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Message: 7
> > Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:40:08 -0000
> > From: "Claire Kennard" <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> >
> > --- In [log in to unmask], Deborah <deblybug@m...> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear Midwives of Great Britain,
> >>
> >> Shall we put a proposal together with the One-to-one campaign, get a
> >> business proposal organised, get on the RCOG, Health Government
> > offices
> >> in London, everywhere, and start laying out proposals for protocols
> > and
> >> guidelines based on evidence, instinct, and intuition to work with
> >> women and consumer groups to take over the maternity services from
> > our
> >> patriarchal masters????? Yeah-Ha! And set up selling our services,
> >> audited etc, back to the health service. Community based, of course.
> >>
> >
> > Hoorah! I'd go for it, in a shot. It makes sense... unlike a lot in
> > the 'real life' world of midwifery...
> >
> > Claire
> > Midwife!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Message: 8
> > Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:42:56 +0000
> > From: Deborah <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> >
> > Dear All,
> > I must say, I would love to develop this but how on earth one would do
> > it I don't know. I know Laura, who has a young baby and older kids, is
> > doing a great thing with the One2one campaign. The time is not right
> > for me to start the revolution yet - still have it in my mind though!
> > One day.........
> >
> > Debs Purdue
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Message: 9
> > Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:48:12 -0000
> > From: "Claire Kennard" <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: male midwife at homebirth
> >
> > --- In [log in to unmask], Beth-Midwifery <beth-
> > midwifery@c...> wrote:
> >>
> >> I feel I have to put in my 2p worth. I resent being told that i
> >> cannot possibly be a good midwife because I have not given birth to
> > a
> >> child. I would consider it a failing of my training and of my
> >> compassion (or what ever you want to call it) if some one felt that
> >> of me. Yes every woman should have a choice of who looks after her
> >> and I would never deny anyone that but to make sweeping statements
> >> like that helps nobody. I am not getting at people who have other
> >> views to mine but would hope after meeting me that they would feel
> >> differently.
> >
> > That kind of sums up how I feel, Beth- yes, I know everyone is
> > probably fed up with this by now!
> >
> > What I'm getting from some people here is: everyone should be able to
> > choose who they like based on whatever criteria they want. (fine, in
> > principle, but where do you draw the line? Will I be refused because I
> > am 'too young', what about the choices made based on racial or
> > homophobic prejudice? Is that ok?). But I am also hearing 'based on
> > experience, midwives with children were better than those without
> > children, this is not a bias it is just a true experience'. So if this
> > is really the truth, then should I give up now, and come back when
> > I've found someone to inseminate me? Because the logical train of
> > thought there is that I can't help being 'not as good' because I
> > haven't got children. That's not from an 'opinion' point of view but
> > if this is really what women are relating as their experiences,
> > perhaps I oughtn't to be a midwife...?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY
> > Posts from this list must not be forwarded to other lists or individuals
> > without the express permission of the author.
> >
> > CHANGING YOUR UKMIDWIFERY SETTINGS:
> >
> > To change to the Daily Digest, go no-mail (ie read emails only on the
> > website), to leave the list, and to remove graphics and adverts from
> > messages, go to 'Edit My Membership' at
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ukmidwifery
> >
> > You can also UNSUBSCRIBE by sending a blank email to:
> > [log in to unmask] and NOT to the usual group
> > address.
> > ***********************
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> > <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ukmidwifery/
> >
> > <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > [log in to unmask]
> >
> > <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.3/174 - Release Date: 17-11-05
>
|