JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives


MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives


MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Home

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Home

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH  2005

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: The price women pay who refuse routine scans?

From:

Else Broberg Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health research." <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 16:51:57 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (508 lines)

In Denmark itīs any womanīs right to give midwife-assisted birth at home.
She cannot be refused, irrespective of whether she has refused the routine
datings or not. Midwives/doctors will probably try to persuade/recommend her
to go to the hospital - and may also "label" her a high-risk. But the woman
has the law on her side.
The recent 20 years I think, the home-birth rate in DK has been 1-2 %.

bw
Else Broberg


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jane sandall" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 5:12 PM
Subject: The price women pay who refuse routine scans?


> Dear listmembers
> Has anyone come across the following practice?
> If a woman refuses a routine dating or anomaly scan, she is labelled high
> risk and 'not allowed' to have a home birth or give birth in a midwife led
> unit birth. I am wondering how common this practice is, and whether there
is
> any evidence to justify it?
>
> bw
> Jane Sandall
>
> Dr Jane Sandall
> Professor of Midwifery and Women's Health
> Midwifery and Women's Health Research Group,
> Health and Social Care Research Division
> King's College, Waterloo Bridge Wing,
> 150 Stamford Street,
> London, SE1 9NH
> Tel: 020 7848 3605
> Fax: 020 7848 3764
> e-mail:[log in to unmask]
> http://www.kcl.ac.uk/nursing/research/women.html
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 12:52 PM
> Subject: [ukmidwifery] Digest Number 3174
>
>
> > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
> > Ever feel sad or cry for no reason at all? Depression. Narrated by Kate
> > Hudson.
> > http://us.click.yahoo.com/CgpDEA/ubOLAA/xGEGAA/rRBslB/TM
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------~->
> >
> > There are 9 messages in this issue.
> >
> > Topics in this digest:
> >
> >      1. Re: human milk donors
> >           From: Cerys Byrne <[log in to unmask]>
> >      2. Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> >           From: [log in to unmask]
> >      3. Re: Re: Prolonged second stage
> >           From: Deborah <[log in to unmask]>
> >      4. Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> >           From: Deborah <[log in to unmask]>
> >      5. Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> >           From: [log in to unmask]
> >      6. Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> >           From: "jane dutton" <[log in to unmask]>
> >      7. Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> >           From: "Claire Kennard" <[log in to unmask]>
> >      8. Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> >           From: Deborah <[log in to unmask]>
> >      9. Re: male midwife at homebirth
> >           From: "Claire Kennard" <[log in to unmask]>
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Message: 1
> >   Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 08:59:07 +0000
> >   From: Cerys Byrne <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: human milk donors
> >
> > That makes sense.
> >
> > Cerys
> >
> >
> > Nico Nelson wrote:
> >> Cerys,
> >>
> >> I suppose the reason is that the milk is desperately needed for little
> >> babies and especially premmies so while the bm from mothers of 6 month
+
> >> babies is still useful it is not useful for those that need the bm the
> >> most.
> >
> >> Sam
> >>
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Message: 2
> >   Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 05:35:11 EST
> >   From: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> >
> > If they can do it then so can the IMA and OMOM!  How did they achieve
> > this?
> >
> > Gail
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Message: 3
> >   Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:55:39 +0000
> >   From: Deborah <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: Re: Prolonged second stage
> >
> > Dear Georgina,
> > My recollection of Jean's personal experience is that she states she
> > has a platypelloid pelvis, first stage labour for days, then her baby
> > got himself into the pelvis and came out........ relatively easily I
> > think. Others may have clearer recollection.
> > Debs Purdue
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Message: 4
> >   Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:01:21 +0000
> >   From: Deborah <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> >
> > Dear Midwives of Great Britain,
> >
> > Shall we put a proposal together with the One-to-one campaign, get a
> > business proposal organised, get on the RCOG, Health Government offices
> > in London, everywhere, and start laying out proposals for protocols and
> > guidelines based on evidence, instinct, and intuition to work with
> > women and consumer groups to take over the maternity services from our
> > patriarchal masters????? Yeah-Ha! And set up selling our services,
> > audited etc, back to the health service. Community based, of course.
> >
> > Debs Purdue Ind MW
> > On 18 Nov 2005, at 07:22, eleanor wrote:
> >
> >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4448008.stm
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Isn't this almost full circle?
> >>
> >> IS
> >> Eleanor Peck
> >> Independent Midwife
> >> www.birthathome.co.uk
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> CONFIDENTIALITY
> >> Posts from this list must not be forwarded to other lists or
> >> individuals without the express permission of the author.
> >>
> >> CHANGING YOUR UKMIDWIFERY SETTINGS:
> >>
> >> To change to the Daily Digest, go no-mail (ie read emails only on the
> >> website), to leave the list, and to remove graphics and adverts from
> >> messages, go to 'Edit My Membership' at
> >> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ukmidwifery
> >>
> >> You can also UNSUBSCRIBE by sending a blank email to:
> >> [log in to unmask] and NOT to the usual group
> >> address.
> >> ***********************
> >>
> >>
> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Message: 5
> >   Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 06:06:00 EST
> >   From: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 18/11/2005 11:03:13 GMT Standard Time,
> > [log in to unmask] writes:
> >
> > Dear  Midwives of Great Britain,
> >
> > Shall we put a proposal together with the  One-to-one campaign, get a
> > business proposal organised, get on the RCOG,  Health Government offices
> > in London, everywhere, and start laying out  proposals for protocols and
> > guidelines based on evidence, instinct, and  intuition to work with
> > women and consumer groups to take over the  maternity services from our
> > patriarchal masters????? Yeah-Ha! And set up  selling our services,
> > audited etc, back to the health service. Community  based, of course.
> >
> >
> >
> > Computer says yes.  YES YES AND YES.  How do we do it?
> >
> > Gail
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Message: 6
> >   Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:30:10 -0000
> >   From: "jane dutton" <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> >
> > Thinking along similar lines myself, it's a great idea and extremely
> > empowering for all us downtrodden NHS midwives trying to make a
difference
> > within a culture of budgets and deficits!
> > Sign me up
> > Jane
> >  ----- Original Message ----- 
> >  From: Deborah
> >  To: [log in to unmask]
> >  Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:01 AM
> >  Subject: Re: [ukmidwifery] Nurses sell services back to NHS
> >
> >
> >  Dear Midwives of Great Britain,
> >
> >  Shall we put a proposal together with the One-to-one campaign, get a
> >  business proposal organised, get on the RCOG, Health Government offices
> >  in London, everywhere, and start laying out proposals for protocols and
> >  guidelines based on evidence, instinct, and intuition to work with
> >  women and consumer groups to take over the maternity services from our
> >  patriarchal masters????? Yeah-Ha! And set up selling our services,
> >  audited etc, back to the health service. Community based, of course.
> >
> >  Debs Purdue Ind MW
> >  On 18 Nov 2005, at 07:22, eleanor wrote:
> >
> >  > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4448008.stm
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > Isn't this almost full circle?
> >  >
> >  > IS
> >  > Eleanor Peck
> >  > Independent Midwife
> >  > www.birthathome.co.uk
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > CONFIDENTIALITY
> >  > Posts from this list must not be forwarded to other lists or
> >  > individuals without the express permission of the author.
> >  >
> >  > CHANGING YOUR UKMIDWIFERY SETTINGS:
> >  >
> >  > To change to the Daily Digest, go no-mail (ie read emails only on the
> >  > website), to leave the list, and to remove graphics and adverts from
> >  > messages, go to 'Edit My Membership' at
> >  > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ukmidwifery
> >  >
> >  > You can also UNSUBSCRIBE by sending a blank email to:
> >  > [log in to unmask] and NOT to the usual group
> >  > address.
> >  > ***********************
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  CONFIDENTIALITY
> >  Posts from this list must not be forwarded to other lists or
individuals
> > without the express permission of the author.
> >
> >  CHANGING YOUR UKMIDWIFERY SETTINGS:
> >
> >  To change to the Daily Digest, go no-mail (ie read emails only on the
> > website), to leave the list, and to remove graphics and adverts from
> > messages, go to 'Edit My Membership' at
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ukmidwifery
> >
> >  You can also UNSUBSCRIBE by sending a blank email to:
> >  [log in to unmask] and NOT to the usual group
> > address.
> >  ***********************
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> >  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> >    a..  Visit your group "ukmidwifery" on the web.
> >
> >    b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >     [log in to unmask]
> >
> >    c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service.
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Message: 7
> >   Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:40:08 -0000
> >   From: "Claire Kennard" <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> >
> > --- In [log in to unmask], Deborah <deblybug@m...> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear Midwives of Great Britain,
> >>
> >> Shall we put a proposal together with the One-to-one campaign, get a
> >> business proposal organised, get on the RCOG, Health Government
> > offices
> >> in London, everywhere, and start laying out proposals for protocols
> > and
> >> guidelines based on evidence, instinct, and intuition to work with
> >> women and consumer groups to take over the maternity services from
> > our
> >> patriarchal masters????? Yeah-Ha! And set up selling our services,
> >> audited etc, back to the health service. Community based, of course.
> >>
> >
> > Hoorah! I'd go for it, in a shot. It makes sense... unlike a lot in
> > the 'real life' world of midwifery...
> >
> > Claire
> > Midwife!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Message: 8
> >   Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:42:56 +0000
> >   From: Deborah <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: Nurses sell services back to NHS
> >
> > Dear All,
> > I must say, I would love to develop this but how on earth one would do
> > it I don't know. I know Laura, who has a young baby and older kids, is
> > doing a great thing with the One2one campaign. The time is not right
> > for me to start the revolution yet - still have it in my mind though!
> > One day.........
> >
> > Debs Purdue
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Message: 9
> >   Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:48:12 -0000
> >   From: "Claire Kennard" <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: male midwife at homebirth
> >
> > --- In [log in to unmask], Beth-Midwifery <beth-
> > midwifery@c...> wrote:
> >>
> >> I feel I have to put in my 2p worth. I resent being told that i
> >> cannot possibly be a good midwife because I have not given birth to
> > a
> >> child. I would consider it a failing of my training and of my
> >> compassion (or what ever you want to call it) if some one felt that
> >> of me. Yes every woman should have a choice of who looks after her
> >> and I would never deny anyone that but to make sweeping statements
> >> like that helps nobody. I am not getting at people who have other
> >> views to mine but would hope after meeting me that they would feel
> >> differently.
> >
> > That kind of sums up how I feel, Beth- yes, I know everyone is
> > probably fed up with this by now!
> >
> > What I'm getting from some people here is: everyone should be able to
> > choose who they like based on whatever criteria they want. (fine, in
> > principle, but where do you draw the line? Will I be refused because I
> > am 'too young', what about the choices made based on racial or
> > homophobic prejudice? Is that ok?). But I am also hearing 'based on
> > experience, midwives with children were better than those without
> > children, this is not a bias it is just a true experience'. So if this
> > is really the truth, then should I give up now, and come back when
> > I've found someone to inseminate me? Because the logical train of
> > thought there is that I can't help being 'not as good' because I
> > haven't got children. That's not from an 'opinion' point of view but
> > if this is really what women are relating as their experiences,
> > perhaps I oughtn't to be a midwife...?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY
> > Posts from this list must not be forwarded to other lists or individuals
> > without the express permission of the author.
> >
> > CHANGING YOUR UKMIDWIFERY SETTINGS:
> >
> > To change to the Daily Digest, go no-mail (ie read emails only on the
> > website), to leave the list, and to remove graphics and adverts from
> > messages, go to 'Edit My Membership' at
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ukmidwifery
> >
> > You can also UNSUBSCRIBE by sending a blank email to:
> > [log in to unmask] and NOT to the usual group
> > address.
> > ***********************
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> > <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> >    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ukmidwifery/
> >
> > <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >    [log in to unmask]
> >
> > <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> >    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.3/174 - Release Date: 17-11-05
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager