Hello all,
Further to Jessica's message I would like to clarify the 2002 regulations.
The form APP1 at the end of the handbook should make clear that the
application is in two parts.
The first part is a 4,000 word written statement, addressing the six
sections in the form.
The second part is the portfolio itself. This asks for an evaluative
introduction of up to 1,000 words.
I hope this is useful and all candidates are welcome to contact the
Ridgmount Street office with any questions.
There is a discussion list dedicated to Chartership questions at:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/LIS-CILIP-REG.html
Best wishes
Michael
Michael Martin
Adviser, Qualifications & Professional Development
CILIP
7 Ridgmount Street
London WC1E 7AE
020 7255 0625
[log in to unmask]
www.cilip.org.uk/jobs_careers/employ.html
************************************
CILIP - more services, more advice, more support, more publications, more
training opportunities, more jobs information, more meeting space, more
members. Unbeatable networking opportunities.
Are you getting the most out of your membership?
www.cilip.org.uk - there's more to membership than you think.
>Dear all
>
>I would like some clarification from people who have recently submitted
successfully under route A 2002 regulations (or anyone else in the know).
What exactly is required for successful submission?
>
>I have included the portfolio of evidence, 1000 word evaluative
introduction (highlighting what evidence was chosen and how it reflects my
professional development) and annotated contents pages (around 4000 words
including brief description and evaluation of context) cv and job
description. As outlined in section 7.2 of the regulations and notes from
CILIP.
>
>I have recently found reference to another 4000 word statement of
professional development buried later in the regulations (section 11.1)
This it appears should follow the structure of the APP1 form (which mirrors
exactly the training plan which forms the structure of my annotated
contents). I feel this will duplicate the work I've already produced.
>
>I have found the instructions extremely unclear and CILIP have been
inconsistent in their response to my queries.
>
>Please can someone give me a definitive answer!!
>
>Jessica Warner
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>
>This message is intended for the stated addressee(s) only and may contain
confidential or sensitive information.
>Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail do not necessarily reflect
those of Kingston College.
>
>If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received
this e-mail in error.
>You are strictly prohibited from using, printing, copying, forwarding or
disseminating this e-mail or any information contained in it.
>
>This email has been scanned by MessageLabs Security System - KCNET.
>______________________________________________________________________
|