On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 12:44:26PM -0000 or thereabouts, Brew, CAJ (Chris) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It would satisfy me but:
>
> on my SL CE
>
> [root@heplnx201 root]# /usr/bin/lsb_release -a
> LSB Version: 1.3
> Distributor ID: n/a
> Description: Scientific Linux SL Release 3.0.3 (SL)
> Release: n/a
> Codename: n/a
>
> I guess we need to feed this back to Fermi.
Not really, from the man page only the description is a required
field and it is well formed.
Scientific Linux SL Release 3.0.3 (SL)
"Distributor release x.x (Codename)"
so it should be a "release" and not a "Release" but everything
else is available in the correct place.
With cern being
Scientific Linux CERN release 3.0.3 (SL)
I think there is everything we need to script this choice
away. Well for GNU/linux anyway.
Steve
>
> Chris.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: LHC Computer Grid - Rollout
> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kostas Koumantaros
> > Sent: 23 February 2005 12:39
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: [LCG-ROLLOUT] OS tag proposal (was unambig CE tags)
> >
> > Sound Great,
> > and if We automate Dist ID and Release It would be perfect
> > :)
> >
> > Kostas
> >
> >
> > Jeff Templon wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > the /usr/bin/lsb_release -i -r idea from Kostas seems to have
> > > potential. The only thing that is missing is some generic
> > tag, since
> > > SL and CentOS are really two derivatives of RHEL. Perhaps
> > we could do
> > > the following:
> > >
> > > name: EL for enterprise Linux, RHC red hat classic numbering scheme,
> > > etc.
> > > version: the "distributor ID" as provided by /usr/bin/lsb_release -i
> > > release: the release number as provided by
> > /usr/bin/lsb_release -i -r
> > >
> > > Here is the output I got from four systems, along with what the Glue
> > > Schema would contain if we go with the above proposal:
> > >
> > > lxplus.cern.ch
> > > Distributor ID: ScientificCERN
> > > Release: 3.0.3
> > >
> > > Name: EL
> > > Version: ScientificCERN
> > > Release: 3.0.3
> > > ==================================
> > >
> > > tbn20.nikhef.nl (our new CE)
> > > Distributor ID: CentOS
> > > Release: 3.3
> > >
> > > Name: EL
> > > Version: CentOS
> > > Release: 3.3
> > > ===================================
> > >
> > > juno.nikhef.nl (my desktop)
> > > Distributor ID: RedHat
> > > Release: 7.3
> > >
> > > Name: RHC
> > > Version: RedHat
> > > Release: 7.3
> > > ===================================
> > >
> > > my laptop
> > > dhcp-122:~ templon$ /usr/bin/lsb_release -i -r
> > > -bash: /usr/bin/lsb_release: No such file or directory
> > >
> > > [ oh well ]
> > >
> > > dhcp-122:~ templon$ uname -a
> > > Darwin dhcp-122.nikhef.nl 7.8.0 Darwin Kernel Version
> > 7.8.0: Wed Dec 22
> > > 14:26:17 PST 2004; root:xnu/xnu-517.11.1.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC Power
> > > Macintosh powerpc
> > >
> > > Name: BSD
> > > Version: Apple
> > > Release: 10.3.8
> > >
> > > What do people think??? Thanks Kostas for an interesting idea.
> > >
> > > JT
> > >
> > > On Feb 23, 2005, at 12:36, Kostas Georgiou wrote:
> > >
> > >> $ /usr/bin/lsb_release -a
> > >> LSB Version: 1.2.0
> > >> Distributor ID: RedHat
> > >> Description: Red Hat Linux release 7.3 (Valhalla)
> > >> Release: 7.3
> > >> Codename: Valhalla
> > >>
> > >> Kostas
> > >
> >
--
Steve Traylen
[log in to unmask]
http://www.gridpp.ac.uk/
|