Hullo Maarten, Sunday Grrrreetings to all,
On Sunday 30 January 2005 01:21, you wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, David WEISSENBACH wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > Concerning pbs packages that disappeared from the CE and the WNs,
> > I also finally got them to be installed by lcfg : there was NO include of
> > lrms-server-rpm.h and lrms-client-rpm.h in the packages list. I fixed it
> > in the LCG-2_2_0 way.
>
> I do not see how you could find that lrms-server-rpm.h and
> lrms-client-rpm.h were not included: CE-rpm and WN-rpm clearly include
> them!
I finally see : I used the directory rpmlist_rh73 rather than rpmlist
The differences between them are exactly what we've been aguing about,
with the tank thing as a final addition.
[root@pavy rpmlist]# for i in * ; do echo $i ; diff -w $i ../rpmlist_rh73/$i;
echo ; done
All-Services-rpm
15d14
< #include "security-rpm.h"
BASE-rpm
Broker-client-rpm.h
Broker-server-rpm.h
CA-rpm
CE-rpm
20d19
< #include "security-rpm.h"
42,45d40
<
< /* Computing Element is both LRMS server and client. */
< #include "lrms-server-rpm.h"
< #include "lrms-client-rpm.h"
[ ... I skip the contents of the CVS subdir .... ]
ComputingElement-rpm.h
FM-client-rpm.h
LCAS-rpm.h
LCG-BDII-rpm
LCG-BDII-rpm.h
LCMAPS-rpm.h
LIVEOS-rpm
LRC-client-rpm.h
Logging-client-rpm.h
Logging-server-rpm.h
MDS-rpm
22c22
< edg-info-main-3.0.22-lcg2
---
> edg-info-main-lcg3.0.23-1
MON-rpm
PG-rpm
PX-rpm
17d16
< #include "security-rpm.h"
PlainGRIS-rpm.h
Proxy-rpm.h
RB-BDII-UI-rpm
15d14
< #include "security-rpm.h"
RB-rpm
14d13
< #include "security-rpm.h"
43a43,45
>
> /* RGMA */
> #include "RGMA-client-rpm.h"
RGMA-client-rpm.h
RGMA-server-rpm.h
RLI-client-rpm.h
RM-client-rpm.h
RMC-client-rpm.h
ROS-client-rpm.h
ResourceBroker-rpm.h
SECLASSIC-rpm
23d22
< #include "security-rpm.h"
StorageElementClassic-rpm.h
TAR-rpm
17c17
< python2-2.2-16
---
> python2-2.2.2-11.7.3
18a19
> tk-8.3.3-67
19a21
> tix-8.2.0b1-67
UI-rpm
22d21
< #include "security-rpm.h"
UserInterface-rpm.h
VOMS-client-rpm.h
VOMS-rpm
diff: ../rpmlist_rh73/VOMS-rpm: No such file or directory
WN-rpm
17d16
< #include "security-rpm.h"
37,39d35
<
< /* Worker node is a LRMS client. */
< #include "lrms-client-rpm.h"
WorkerNode-rpm.h
condorg-rpm.h
edg-profile-rpm.h
gcc-2.95.2-rpm.h
globus-rpm.h
java-data-util-config-rpm.h
java-data-util-rpm.h
java-devel-tools-rpm.h
java-security-client-rpm.h
java-tools-rpm.h
lcfgng-client-component-rpm.h
lcfgng-client-rpm.h
4c4
< $Header: /cvs/lcgdeploy/lcg2/rpmlist/lcfgng-client-rpm.h,v 1.7 2004/06/17
14:06:04 lfield Exp $
---
> $Header: /cvs/lcgdeploy/lcg2/rpmlist_rh73/lcfgng-client-rpm.h,v 1.1
2004/11/10 08:57:29 okeeble Exp $
lcfgng-common-rpm.h
lcfgng-server-rpm
lcfgng-server-rpm.h
lcg-audit-client-rpm.h
lcg-profile-rpm.h
lrms-client-rpm.h
lrms-server-rpm.h
lsf-client-rpm.h
lsf-server-rpm.h
pbs-client-rpm.h
pbs-server-rpm.h
rfio-client-rpm.h
rfio-server-rpm.h
rh73-default-groups.h
rh73-release-rpm.h
rh73-updates-rpm.h
security-rpm.h
security-support-rpm.h
tank-client-rpm.h
diff: ../rpmlist_rh73/tank-client-rpm.h: No such file or directory
tank-server-rpm.h
diff: ../rpmlist_rh73/tank-server-rpm.h: No such file or directory
tomcat-server-rpm.h
[root@pavy rpmlist]#
I suppose I'd better stick to the rpmlist version ?
>
> Are you sure you checked out the LCG-2_3_0 tag without errors?
> And that your node profiles are indeed using the 2_3_0 files?
>
> > Same for the CA-rpms that disappeared from every host that hadn't the
> > updaterpms.localpkgs flag set : there's no include in the packages list I
> > downloaded. I suppose that will bother me a bit when the next ca_ rpms
> > upgrade will arise, but I suppose I will be able to handle it at that
> > time :)
>
> Just about every rpm list includes "security-rpm.h", so there is something
> funny going on...
>
Well, if it's fun for you, I'll be glad with it :-) The purpose of this wasn't
to bore anyone indeed...
> > Finally, the non lhc VO addition was also buggy : site-cfh.h doesn't
> > contain #define SITE_CFG
> > #include CFGDIR/vos-cfh.h"
> > #undef SITE_CFG
> > so I added it just afet the #defines handling the SA_PATH_* for the lhc
> > VOs and that gave me the support of the non lhc VOs back.
>
> Indeed, the site-cfg.h.template (!) should have contained those lines.
> I have added them now, so it should be better in LCG-2_4_0.
> Thanks for that bug report.
Thanks for your support, many apologises for time loss I generated.
David
|