Hi David,
I'll look at the code...
At the moment, we're in the process of thinking about how to enhance
SFTs, and bug reports/communication about tests/sensors and so on is
part of what we'd like to improve...
So I would say for now that me, Judith Novak and Piotr are currently the
ones to contact (since we are the ones who have write access on the SFT
CVS...)
Cheers
Fred
P.S : just in case, email addresses :
Piotr.Nyczyk at CERN.CH
frederic.schaer at in2p3.fr
Judit.Novak at CERN.CH
David McBride wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I notice that the SFTs now have a new test, checking for secure R-GMA
> connectors. However, they're failing at my site; spot the obvious
> mistake:
>
> ( From
> https://lcg-sft.cern.ch/sft/info/mars-ce.mars.lesc.doc.ic.ac.uk/sft_2005-12-01_22.05.01.html#sft-rgma-sc_2005-12-01_22:15:33)
>
>
> -----8<-------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Checking R-GMA secure connector
> Looking for R-GMA location
> RGMA_HOME=/homes/lt2-lcg/LCG-2_6_0//glite
> R-GMA client config file:
> /homes/lt2-lcg/LCG-2_6_0//glite/etc/rgma/rgma.conf
> R-GMA monbox:
> CanonicalProducer=https://mars-se.mars.lesc.doc.ic.ac.uk:20000/R-GMA/CanonicalProducerServlet
>
> Running test script
>
> + edg-java-security-tomcat-test.sh
> CanonicalProducer=https://mars-se.mars.lesc.doc.ic.ac.uk:20000/R-GMA/CanonicalProducerServlet
> 8443
> + grep 'Handshake succesful' sft-rgma-sc.log
> + result=1
> + set +x
>
> ERROR!!!
> Contents of sft-rgma-sc.log
>
> Connecting server
> CanonicalProducer=https://mars-se.mars.lesc.doc.ic.ac.uk:20000/R-GMA/CanonicalProducerServlet
> port 8443 using SSL
>
> [...]
>
> -----8<-------------------------------------------------------------
>
> It appears confused as to precisely which socket on mars-se it should
> be trying to connect to. I've informed it that it should use port
> 20000 (because DPM's srm_v1 service is already using port 8443 on
> mars-se) but it still seems to be trying to connect to the regular port?
>
> Is this a test bug or a configuration bug?
>
> (I don't know who maintains the SFTs; where should this bug be raised?)
>
> Cheers,
> David
|