> Separately there is the CESEBind (close SE) information, which is
> published by a CE, and which has traditionally carried not only the CESE
> binding but also information for classic SEs on where to store the data,
> hence all classic SEs need to be bound to a CE. That isn't needed for an
> SRM, but it looks like lcg-cr still thinks it is. That's also fixed by
> the new schema, but again the code hasn't yet been updated to look for
> it.
>
No, if it found the SE type is SRM1, it doesn't need CESEBind and the
Access Point.
Di
|