On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Frederic Schaer wrote:
> I see no difference on the 2 pages :
>
> lxb2001 :
> SD: 26 JL: 7 JS: 9 CT: 21 OK: 102 All: 165
>
>
> lcg-sft :
> SD: 26 JL: 7 JS: 9 CT: 21 OK: 102 All: 165
>
>
> ... Maybe there were differences because the results were beeing
> published (and loading the same page would have also given different
> results) ?
Now I do see the same results, but when I looked yesterday evening
the second page only had 161 sites, out of which around 85 were OK,
whereas the first page had 107 OK, like now...
> Maarten Litmaath wrote:
>
> > Antun Balaz wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> I have just noticed that SFT results are not published anymore at
> >>
> >> https://lcg-sft.cern.ch:9443/sft/lastreport.cgi
> >>
> >> but rather at
> >>
> >> https://lxb2001.cern.ch:8443/sft/lastreport.cgi
> >>
> >> which was used previously. The first address was said to be permanent?
> >
> >
> > In fact the results on the two pages are different:
> > the first has more sites and also a higher fraction of good sites...
> > I suppose the SFT experts will comment on this.
> >
>
|